On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:13:47AM +0800, Chen, Dongdong (GE
Healthcare) wrote: Checksum is my primitive thought, is there table
level checksum? Our objective is like this: If shutdown normally, OK.
If shutdown ABNORMALLY, then reboot the OS, check whether there is
database records loss or
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 08:43:51PM -0400, Martin Gainty wrote:
your survey should refrain from collecting demographic information
demographic information has no bearing on Computer Science, the
Apache community in general or becoming a contributor to the Postgres
community
Really? How can
Hi,
I am running postgres 8.3 on a W2K8 server and appear to be getting lots
of cannot reattach to shared memory errors in the log. I used to get
these before on a windows 2K3 server but I was under the impression that
these were caused by ESET NOD32 antivirus software. But I am not running
Hi,
Thanks in advance for your help.
I have a lot of experience with object-oriented programming and relational
databases, but I'm new to PostgreSQL.
My agency has a contractor that created a PostgreSQL database that he calls
object-oriented. I noticed that the contractor has more than
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Robert Pepersack
rpepers...@mdinsurance.state.md.us wrote:
Hi,
Thanks in advance for your help.
I have a lot of experience with object-oriented programming and relational
databases, but I'm new to PostgreSQL.
My agency has a contractor that created a
In response to Robert Pepersack rpepers...@mdinsurance.state.md.us:
Hi,
Thanks in advance for your help.
I have a lot of experience with object-oriented programming and relational
databases, but I'm new to PostgreSQL.
My agency has a contractor that created a PostgreSQL database
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Robert Pepersack
rpepers...@mdinsurance.state.md.us wrote:
My agency has a contractor that created a PostgreSQL database that he calls
object-oriented.
I might be incorrect in my thinking about what makes PostgreSQL
Object-Relational, but my understanding is
I need to compile some code that uses libpq. For this I need to determine
the directories to use for the header and library files.
The machine I'm using has multiple copies of the files libpq-fe.h and
libpq.a. How can I determine which one of all these copies are the ones
that correspond to the
On Apr 27, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Robert Pepersack wrote:
My agency has a contractor that created a PostgreSQL database that
he calls object-oriented. I noticed that the contractor has more
than one value in a column separated by commas. In the relational
world, this obviously violates first
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:51:45AM -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
I need to compile some code that uses libpq. For this I need to determine
the directories to use for the header and library files.
The machine I'm using has multiple copies of the files libpq-fe.h and
libpq.a. How can I determine
I've been working successfully with postgreSQL 7.4 for a while now, and
we're now finally picking up a recent version (8.3.5).
Unfortunately my existing migration code is failing due to some changes
with 8.3.
my $sql =EOF;
ALTER TABLE instances ADD COLUMN udp_icpside_address_override inet
Michael P. Soulier michael_soul...@mitel.com writes:
This worked in 7.4 but fails now with
cannot ALTER TABLE instances because it has pending trigger events
I think the problem is you're issuing all those commands in one
transaction. If you COMMIT the updates then the subsequent ALTERs
should
Is it possible to find out the OID types of the columns of a table
using the information schema?
I see that I can get the character names of the types using this query:
select * from information_schema.columns where table_name = 'my_table';
but I don't see a way to find the actual OID types of
I read the document on array data types. Do they have anything at all to do
with PostgreSQL being object-oriented?
Also, these comma-delimited fields make creating reports with our reporting
tool impossible.
Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com 4/27/2009 10:35 AM
In response to Robert
Whit Armstrong armstrong.w...@gmail.com writes:
Is it possible to find out the OID types of the columns of a table
using the information schema?
No. Type OIDs are a Postgres-ism so they are not reflected in the
standards-mandated contents of the information_schema. If you want
OIDs you'll
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
my $sql =EOF;
ALTER TABLE instances ADD COLUMN udp_icpside_address_override inet
DEFAULT NULL;
ALTER TABLE instances ADD COLUMN udp_setside_address_override inet
DEFAULT NULL;
UPDATE instances SET udp_icpside_address_override =
$udp_icpside_address_override;
In response to Robert Pepersack rpepers...@mdinsurance.state.md.us:
I read the document on array data types. Do they have anything at all to do
with PostgreSQL being object-oriented?
If you want to be pedantic, not really. Technically, Postgres isn't
object-oriented, it's object-relational.
Whit Armstrong escribió:
Is it possible to find out the OID types of the columns of a table
using the information schema?
No; information_schema is limited to stuff that's defined by the SQL
standard. If you want OIDs, you need to extract that stuff from the
pg_catalog.* catalogs.
Type OIDs
Howard Cole wrote:
Hi,
I am running postgres 8.3 on a W2K8 server and appear to be getting lots
of cannot reattach to shared memory errors in the log. I used to get
these before on a windows 2K3 server but I was under the impression that
these were caused by ESET NOD32 antivirus
(I had accidentally replied to Tom only on my reply)
the OID's can be found as follows:
SELECT * FROM pg_attribute
WHERE attrelid = (SELECT oid FROM pg_class WHERE relname = 'mytable');
from this page:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/datatype-oid.html
However, there is no
Michael P. Soulier michael_soul...@mitel.com writes:
But I don't understand why this was required. What's wrong with adding a
column and copying data into it in a transaction?
Nothing. The problem apparently is that you've got deferred AFTER
triggers on that table, so the UPDATE commands have
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout
klep...@svana.orgwrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:51:45AM -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
I need to compile some code that uses libpq. For this I need to
determine
the directories to use for the header and library files.
The machine
Whit Armstrong armstrong.w...@gmail.com writes:
However, there is no example that uses a schema + tablename.
If you're into masochism you can do that with a join of pg_class and
pg_namespace. But what's usually easier for one-off queries is to
use the regclass converter:
select attname,
Kynn Jones kyn...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout
klep...@svana.orgwrote:
In general you don't need to match the server version, the protocol
hasn't changed much in a while so as long as it's less than a few years
old it'll work.
This statement
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:27:37PM -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout
klep...@svana.orgwrote:
In general you don't need to match the server version, the protocol
hasn't changed much in a while so as long as it's less than a few
years old it'll
Thanks, Tom.
I guess the answer is, yes, but perhaps you can help me decide.
I'm just reading this part of the documentation from the link I
posted: OIDs are not added to user-created tables, unless WITH OIDS
is specified when the table is created. and also:
The oid type is currently
Whit Armstrong armstrong.w...@gmail.com writes:
Am I misinterpreting this documentation? Are there cases in which the
OID's of two tables will collide? I don't see any uniqueness
constraints on the pg_class table.
You didn't look too hard:
regression=# \d pg_class
...
Indexes:
ok, got it.
thanks for the clarification and the hand holding.
-Whit
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Whit Armstrong armstrong.w...@gmail.com writes:
Am I misinterpreting this documentation? Are there cases in which the
OID's of two tables will collide?
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Robert Pepersack rpepers...@mdinsurance.state.md.us:
I read the document on array data types. Do they have anything at all to do
with PostgreSQL being object-oriented?
If you want to be pedantic, not really. Technically, Postgres isn't
In response to Eric Schwarzenbach subscri...@blackbrook.org:
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Robert Pepersack rpepers...@mdinsurance.state.md.us:
I read the document on array data types. Do they have anything at all to
do with PostgreSQL being object-oriented?
If you
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com wrote:
Reading between the lines, the original question was: This guy is
making my life difficult, and he claims it's for this reason.
I read the question more as Did we hire some database contractor who
has no idea what he's
I have a poorly performing query that looks something like
select x.name, x.title, x.value
from
(select a.name as name, b.book_title as title, c.cost as value from ..) x
where
exists (select 'found_it' from get_jobs(x.name) j where j.job = 'carpenter');
I did it this way because I
Is there any sane reason to use an array column, besides performance
(the values can be read in less disk seeks than in a
table-with-a-foreign-key scenario)?
Greetings
marcin
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Hello Group,
I am in the process of migrating Postgres from version 7.3 to 8.1.1 on
the Linux 5 server with JDK 1.6 installed and I am using
“postgresql-8.3-604.jdbc4.jar”.
When I try to call a Postgres function from my Java code I am
receiving the following error.
Hi Robert,
Inheritance normally are defined in the Object Orientated environment.
I however have a different perspective regarding when a database is
defined as OO.
One of the most common OO-databases that I am familiar with is
Intersystems Cache.
If for example we look at how PG create
Hi Group,
I am in the process of migrating Postgres from version 7.3 to 8.1.1 on
the Linux 5 server with JDK 1.6 installed and I am using
“postgresql-8.3-604.jdbc4.jar”.
When I try to call a Postgres function from my Java code I am
receiving the following error.
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 20:37 +0200, marcin mank wrote:
Is there any sane reason to use an array column, besides performance
(the values can be read in less disk seeks than in a
table-with-a-foreign-key scenario)?
Yes.
I find myself hacking away in pgAdmin most of the time now, after early
on keeping PG source code in text files I could preserve in SVN. At this
point I cannot point to anything other than the pg db itself that has a
full description.
Is this normal? Or do folks assiduously maintain an
Tom Lane wrote:
Nothing. The problem apparently is that you've got deferred AFTER
triggers on that table, so the UPDATE commands have left unprocessed
trigger events behind, and the system can't be sure that those events
would still be sensible to fire after doing further ALTERs on the table.
In response to Kenneth Tilton kentil...@gmail.com:
I find myself hacking away in pgAdmin most of the time now, after early
on keeping PG source code in text files I could preserve in SVN. At this
point I cannot point to anything other than the pg db itself that has a
full description.
I am new to PostgreSQL and I want to use it from a Java Application with the
Hibernate ORM. I ran into a problem when I created my first simple Hello
Postegres app where I receive a 'relation X does not exist' error. It
turns out that the query Hibernate produces seems to be missing some quotes
if your experience started with a DB that supported Object Relational types
such as
http://infolab.stanford.edu/~ullman/fcdb/oracle/or-objects.html
then it is reasonable to assume you would want to maintain those capabilities
can you provide us one testcase we could try to work thru
(using
It looks like pl/php is still on a beta release. Is the previous
non-beta release preferred, or the beta1 tested against 8.3beta1?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 13:33 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
It looks like pl/php is still on a beta release. Is the previous
non-beta release preferred, or the beta1 tested against 8.3beta1?
Better question for the pl/php list. Copying Alexey because he would
know better.
Joshua D. Drake
--
Joshua D. Drake escribió:
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 13:33 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
It looks like pl/php is still on a beta release. Is the previous
non-beta release preferred, or the beta1 tested against 8.3beta1?
Better question for the pl/php list. Copying Alexey because he would
know
Hi,
On Apr 27, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 13:33 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
It looks like pl/php is still on a beta release. Is the previous
non-beta release preferred, or the beta1 tested against 8.3beta1?
Better question for the pl/php list. Copying
Robert Pepersack wrote:
My agency has a contractor that created a PostgreSQL database that he
calls object-oriented. I noticed that the contractor has more than
one value in a column separated by commas. In the relational world,
this obviously violates first normal form. When I asked about
OK, I'm hitting a wall here. I've written this trigger for partitioning:
create or replace function page_access_insert_trigger ()
returns trigger as $$
DECLARE
part text;
q text;
BEGIN
part = to_char(new.timestamp,'MMDD');
q = 'insert into
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I'm hitting a wall here. I've written this trigger for partitioning:
create or replace function page_access_insert_trigger ()
returns trigger as $$
DECLARE
part text;
q text;
BEGIN
part
exists (select ‘found_it’ from get_jobs(x.name) j where j.job =
‘carpenter’);
What does this function do ?
If it only runs on the tables, than simple join will do it pretty fast.
also, keeping job as integer, if table is large will save you some
space, make index lookup faster, and generally
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I'm hitting a wall here. I've written this trigger for partitioning:
create or replace function page_access_insert_trigger ()
returns trigger as $$
DECLARE
part text;
q text;
BEGIN
part
The example was fictitious, but the structure is the same as the real problem.
The stored procedure calls another recursive stored procedure that can take a
long time to run, usually about 3-4 seconds. Not bad for a handful of records,
but it is now operating on a table with over 40,000
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Richard Broersma
richard.broer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com
wrote:
OK, I'm hitting a wall here. I've written this trigger for partitioning:
create or replace function page_access_insert_trigger ()
Michael P. Soulier michael_soul...@mitel.com writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
*Why* you've got such triggers is not apparent from what you've told us.
I've not explicitely created any triggers. The table has constraints,
and if that results in triggers created by the system, then that would
be why.
2009/4/28 Kenneth Tilton kentil...@gmail.com:
I find myself hacking away in pgAdmin most of the time now, after early on
keeping PG source code in text files I could preserve in SVN. At this point
I cannot point to anything other than the pg db itself that has a full
description.
Is this
Our internal task database is doing something odd in that the sequence is
incrementing by 2 instead of 1 and I can't find any reason why I have checked
the
sequence itself to see if it had somehow got set to increment by 2 but no. The
table in question has a number of both before and after
56 matches
Mail list logo
