hmm I wanted to show only rows that was inserted today, so instead of
who='me' wanted to filter for instance where timestamp_column=CURRENT_DATE.
Yes, a view would be a solution but I thouhgt that's the case rules were
made for? Isn't it?
--
View this message in context:
Hi
you can call input function - jsonb_in
Jsonb *targetjsonbvar = DatumGetJsonb(DirectFunctionCall1(json_in,
CStringGetDatum(cstrvalue)));
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2015-02-13 11:32 GMT+01:00 Igor Stassiy istas...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Is there a way to initialize JsonbValue from cstring from
Hi,
Is there a way to initialize JsonbValue from cstring from public c api in
postgres 9.4? Without the use of functions declared with PG_FUNCTION_ARGS
http://doxygen.postgresql.org/fmgr_8h.html#adf4dec9b7d23f1b4c68477affde8b7ff
.
I posted the following question earlier, but received no reply.
No 9.4 available for debian trusty, only option is to build from source.
There is only i386 and amd64, no arm in postgres repo for current
production debian, trusty.
http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/dists/trusty-pgdg/9.4/
The debian testing jessie has 9.4 for my raspberry pi 2, which
On Feb 12, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Day, David d...@redcom.com wrote:
Update/Information sharing on my pursuit of segmentation faults
FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p12 amd64
Postgres version 9.3.5
Below are three postgres core files generated from two different machine (
Georgia and Alabama ) on
Why couldn't an RDBMS such as postgres interpret a SELECT that omits the GROUP
BY as implicitly grouping by all the columns that aren't part of an aggregate?
If I do this, Postgres throws an exception that I cannot SELECT a series of
columns including an aggregate without a corresponding GROUP BY
Hi Glenn,
No, and neither did I receive any responses.
I did find the following reference that 9.4 is officially not supported on
XP, Server 2003 or Vista, however I have not seen anything official on the
PostgreSQL or Enterprise DB sites.
Hi,
you might not be able to run this code, but maybe you know why is there a
type conversion with domain and the concept might apply to other examples
as well. I have the following code:
CREATE FUNCTION get_key_jsonb(key text, j jsonb) RETURNS text
LANGUAGE plv8 IMMUTABLE STRICT
AS $$
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Saimon Lim aimon.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your help
I want to restrict some postgres users as much as possible and allow them to
execute a few my own stored procedures only.
If I block access using:
REVOKE ALL ON pg_catalog.pg_proc FROM PUBLIC;
Guy,
No I had not seen that bug report before. (
https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=122199 )
We did migrate from FreeBSD 9.x (2?) and I think it true
that we were not experiencing the problem at time.
So it might be a good fit/explanation for our current experience
There were a
Purely out of curiosity ...
All support for Windows XP was dropped in April of last year ... and this
was many years after mainstream support was dropped (2009).
What possible reason could you have for still running Windows XP?
Furthermore, do you actually expect application vendors to still
I would not be using xp if I had a choice. Actually would not be using
Windows if I had my own way. Its all to do with Legacy systems.
I have installed 9.3.6.1. which should be fine. This seem to be
working, or it has installed. I will test when I get the time.
-Original Message-
2015-02-13 14:13 GMT+01:00 Ramesh T rameshparnandit...@gmail.com:
COLLECT
Hi
Depends on what you needs. The collections are not supported by PostgreSQL
- use a arrays instead.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/arrays.html
Regards
Pavel Stehule
User created rules are almost never the correct solution. There are too
many cavets and views can accomplish nearly everything that a user might
want.
David J.
On Friday, February 13, 2015, pinker [via PostgreSQL]
ml-node+s1045698n583782...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
hmm I wanted to show only rows
cast(COLLECT (r_id) as num) in oracle..
is their *collect *function in postgres plpgsql?or any alternate for
this..?
thanks in advance,
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:12:13 -0500
Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Tim Uckun timuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anybody have experience with huge number of partitions if so where
did you start running into trouble?
I use an arbitrary 100-way split for a
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Seref Arikan
serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com wrote:
Hi Bill,
Could you point at some resource(s) that discuss inserting directly into
the partition? Would it be possible to read directly from the partition as
well?
When preparing your SQL statement, you
Thanks, google it is then ;)
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com
wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:29:02 +
Seref Arikan serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com wrote:
Hi Bill,
Could you point at some resource(s) that discuss inserting directly into
the
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:24 AM, pinker [via PostgreSQL]
ml-node+s1045698n583786...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
Ok, but in this particular case I don't see any caveats
You mean other than the infinite recursion, right?
and think that could be classic case for rule to be used.
If it is almost
Hi Bill,
Could you point at some resource(s) that discuss inserting directly into
the partition? Would it be possible to read directly from the partition as
well?
Regards
Seref
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com
wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:12:13 -0500
Vick
Ah, I should have thought that it would be simple. Thanks a lot Vick.
Regards
Seref
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Seref Arikan
serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com wrote:
Hi Bill,
Could you point at some resource(s) that
On 13/02/2015 13:13, Ramesh T wrote:
cast(COLLECT (r_id) as num) in oracle..
is their *collect *function in postgres plpgsql?or any alternate
for this..?
I don't use Oracle, but I think array_agg() is the closest - it
aggregates the column into an array.
postgres=# create table test(a
Ok, but in this particular case I don't see any caveats and think that could
be classic case for rule to be used.
If it is almost never the correct solution why rules still exists at all?
--
View this message in context:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:29:02 +
Seref Arikan serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com wrote:
Hi Bill,
Could you point at some resource(s) that discuss inserting directly into
the partition?
Not off the top of my head, I would have to google just like
you would.
Would it be possible to read
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Tim Uckun timuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anybody have experience with huge number of partitions if so where
did you start running into trouble?
I use an arbitrary 100-way split for a lot of tracking info. Just modulo
100 on the ID column. I've never had any
Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com writes:
Why couldn't an RDBMS such as postgres interpret a SELECT that omits the
GROUP
BY as implicitly grouping by all the columns that aren't part of an
aggregate?
I'm Mr. Curious today ...
Why would you think that such a thing is necessary or
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com
wrote:
Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com writes:
Why couldn't an RDBMS such as postgres interpret a SELECT that omits
the GROUP
BY as implicitly grouping by all the columns that aren't part of an
aggregate?
I'm
Hello All!
I install postgresql-server-dev-9.2 from
'deb http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/ squeeze-pgdg main'
and try to build contrib module from 9.2 but it fault with error:
$ make USE_PGXS=1 PG_CONFIG=/usr/lib/postgresql/9.2/bin/pg_config
gcc -g -O2 -I/usr/include/mit-krb5 -fPIC
Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com writes:
Why couldn't an RDBMS such as postgres interpret a SELECT that omits the GROUP
BY as implicitly grouping by all the columns that aren't part of an aggregate?
Per SQL standard, a SELECT with aggregates but no GROUP BY is supposed to
give exactly one
Sergey Burladyan eshkin...@gmail.com writes:
I install postgresql-server-dev-9.2 from
'deb http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/ squeeze-pgdg main'
and try to build contrib module from 9.2 but it fault with error:
$ make USE_PGXS=1 PG_CONFIG=/usr/lib/postgresql/9.2/bin/pg_config
gcc
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:48:13 -0800
Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com
wrote:
Ryan Delaney ryan.dela...@gmail.com writes:
Why couldn't an RDBMS such as postgres interpret a SELECT that omits
the GROUP
BY as
Cross-posting from stackoverflow in the hope of getting some additional
eyes on the question.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28505782/how-can-i-refer-to-an-anyelement-variable-in-postgresql-dynamic-sql
I'm trying to write a PostgreSQL function for table upserts that can be
used for any
On 2/13/15 1:48 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
I waste an inordinate amount of time retyping select lists over into the
group by list, or copying and pasting and then deleting the aggregate
clauses. It is an entirely pointless exercise. I can't fault
PostgreSQL for following the standard, but its too
To lower the amount of time spent copy pasting aggregate column names,
it's probably worth noting Postgres will allow you to short cut that
with the column position. For example:
select long_column_name_A, long_column_name_b, count(1)
from foo
group by 1,2
order by 1,2
This works just fine.
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Brian Dunavant
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 2:11 PM
To: Bill Moran
Cc: Jeff Janes; Ryan Delaney; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SELECT, GROUP BY,
- Original Message -
Purely out of curiosity ...
All support for Windows XP was dropped in April of last year ... and this
was many years after mainstream support was dropped (2009).
What possible reason could you have for still running Windows XP?
Furthermore, do you actually
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:14:10 +1300
Tim Uckun timuc...@gmail.com wrote:
If I used modulo arithmetic how would the query optimizer know which table
to include and exclude? For example say I did modulo 100 based on the field
client_id. I create a base table with the trigger to insert the data
I will take a bit of a contrarian position from the OP. I, personally,
prefer that computer _languages_ do exactly and only what _I_ tell them to
do. I do _NOT_ want them to things for me. IMO, that is why many programs
are unreliable. They make an assumption which is not what the original
Thanks to Gavin and Alban for additional considerations, all very useful.
As for Linux, I have to admit that I am biased too! I use it heavily, which
is the reason I would incline for its use. But after all, since I'm not
going to administrate the server, the best choice will probably be IT
On 2/12/15 5:46 PM, Bo Tian wrote:
I have a question on PG smart shutdown mode.
When shutdown Postgres by issuing /Smart Shutdown /mode
(SIGTERM) request, is there a way for client to be notified of this
shutdown event? I tried PG_NOTIFY, but I cannot get any
notification events when this
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:27:52 +1300
Tim Uckun timuc...@gmail.com wrote:
This might get pretty crazy if I am doing queries like WHERE client_id in
() or when I am trying to join some table with the client table. Maybe I
can precalculate the ids that are going to go into each partition and set
This might get pretty crazy if I am doing queries like WHERE client_id in
() or when I am trying to join some table with the client table. Maybe I
can precalculate the ids that are going to go into each partition and set
the constraint as where client_id in (some_huge_list).
On Sat, Feb 14,
Here's the part that's slow. The index scan on each partition is taking
~2.5ms, and is being repeated 1847 times *for each partition*.
What is the table partitioned on?
The table is partitioned on registration_id.
CREATE TABLE emailsubscription.reg_email_subscriptions_p00
(
Christopher Currie wrote
Cross-posting from stackoverflow in the hope of getting some additional
eyes on the question.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28505782/how-can-i-refer-to-an-anyelement-variable-in-postgresql-dynamic-sql
update_stmt := format(
'UPDATE %s SET %s WHERE %s',
If I used modulo arithmetic how would the query optimizer know which table
to include and exclude? For example say I did modulo 100 based on the field
client_id. I create a base table with the trigger to insert the data into
the proper child table. Each table has the constraint (client_id % 100)
Thanks for your help
I want to restrict some postgres users as much as possible and allow them
to execute a few my own stored procedures only.
If I block access using:
REVOKE ALL ON pg_catalog.pg_proc FROM PUBLIC;
REVOKE ALL ON FUNCTION pg_catalog.pg_get_functiondef(oid) FROM PUBLIC;
the user
Hi George,
Did you find a resolution? I have exactly the same problem. Same
postgres version, same xp with sp3, same error log.
Thanks in advance
Glenn
Glenn Bald | GIS Analyst | Information Services
Forestry Commission
Unknown error while running
Hi,
I started the following query in Postgresql 9.1 where only this sql is
running on the host and it has been taking more than an hour and still
running.
alter table userdata.table1 alter column name type varchar(512);
Here is the table description:
d+ userdata.table1
48 matches
Mail list logo
