I did a stupid mistake. I run the final pg_dumpall without switching to
single-user-mode first.
With "final" I mean that the dump should be transferred to a different machine.
After the dump
the old machine was shut down forever.
My mistake was that I stopped the services, but one process was
> >
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> How would that work? I was under the impression the first column was
> for socket type and limited to
> local, host, hostssl, and hostnossl?
>
> Thunderbird's config has been fixed, so here is the line from
> pg_hba.conf line without the
> formatting issues:
>
> host al
Hi,
I'm trying to setup streaming replication on a cluster of postgresql
databases and I followed the instructions outlined here (
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Streaming_Replication) but I'm stuck on
the archive and restore commands. In reading the comments from the archive
command, WAL archiv
We've been doing backups and restores with many tests and uses and never had a
problem until now. Sadly, I'm not sure where to even begin looking to figure
out what to do, so any pointers would be very much appreciated!
The vital stats:
Pg: 9.5.1 (this will get upgraded to 10.0 when it's av
On 09/11/2017 08:51 AM, rob stone wrote:
Hi Rob,
How would that work? I was under the impression the first column was
for socket type and limited to
local, host, hostssl, and hostnossl?
Thunderbird's config has been fixed, so here is the line from
pg_hba.conf line without the
formatting i
"" writes:
> /opt/pgsql-9.5/bin/pg_restore -v --clean --create --dbname=nms
> --schema=public .
> ...
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: function
> _pg_sv_column_array(oid, smallint[]) does not exist
> LINE 6: _pg_sv_column_array(k1.conrelid, k1.conkey) AS fk_colu
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Dave Florek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to setup streaming replication on a cluster of postgresql
> databases and I followed the instructions outlined here (
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Streaming_Replication) but I'm stuck on
> the archive and restore comma
--- t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
From: Tom Lane
To: ""
cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_restore error -- missing pg table
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:43:16 -0400
"" writes:
> /opt/pgsql-9.5/bin/pg_restore -v --clean --create --dbname=nms
> --schema=public .
> ...
> pg_re
I see.
Thanks Jeff,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Dave Florek
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to setup streaming replication on a cluster of postgresql
>> databases and I followed the instructions outlined here (
>> https://wiki.postgr
So we have a db we're trying to rewind and get synced to the master.
pg_rewind says it doesn't need rewinding, and when we try to bring it
up, it gets this error:
"contrecord is requested by 2E7/4028"
And fails to get back up.
Is this a known issue? Possible bug in the continuation record co
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 4:31 PM, wrote:
>
> GSSAPI is the authentication mechanism of choice, and it's working fine.
>
> Here is what I'm trying to accomplish.
>
> 'user1' == 'user1' and 'us...@a.domain.tld' == 'user1'.
>
> From reading the docs, this is done via the pg_ident.conf file, and from
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> So we have a db we're trying to rewind and get synced to the master.
> pg_rewind says it doesn't need rewinding, and when we try to bring it
> up, it gets this error:
>
> "contrecord is requested by 2E7/4028"
>
> And fails to get back up.
>
> Dear All,
We have one perl script that is opening DB connection and performaing
insert DB operation.When duplicate entry Comming in query,Postgres
forecfully killing process itself and in Postgres log "unexpected EOF on
client connection" error is Comming.
This issue is not Comming every time
Hi all
I am using 9.4.4 on Fedora 22.
I am experimenting with optimising a SQL statement. One version uses 4 LEFT
JOIN’s and a 5-way CASE statement in the body. The second moves the filtering
into the JOIN section, and I end up with 16 LEFT JOIN’s and no CASE statements.
My test involves selec
hi
2017-09-12 8:45 GMT+02:00 Frank Millman :
> Hi all
>
> I am using 9.4.4 on Fedora 22.
>
> I am experimenting with optimising a SQL statement. One version uses 4
> LEFT JOIN’s and a 5-way CASE statement in the body. The second moves the
> filtering into the JOIN section, and I end up with 16 LE
15 matches
Mail list logo