On 10/17/2013 10:51 PM, Huang, Suya wrote:
Question: How can I pull out the real character set information from the
database? does it rely on the understanding of business knowledge?
what did you store in it? because its declared SQL_ASCII, postgres
doesn't know, its all just bytes. you
Hi,
Which is the quickest way to troubleshot the message
LOG: configuration file /postgresql.conf contains errors;
unaffected changes were applied ?
I made a couple of changes a few days ago, and did not reload Today I made
some more changes and did a pg_ctl reload.
Is there an option to
Jayadevan M maymala.jayade...@gmail.com writes:
Which is the quickest way to troubleshot the message
LOG: configuration file /postgresql.conf contains errors;
unaffected changes were applied ?
There should be log message(s) before that one complaining about the
specific problems.
Thanks. This is what I have. May be it is not really an error?
2013-10-18 12:23:54.996 IST,,,8855,,523c23ea.2297,20,,2013-09-20 16:01:06
IST,,0,LOG,0,received SIGHUP, reloading configuration files,
2013-10-18 12:23:54.996 IST,,,8855,,523c23ea.2297,21,,2013-09-20 16:01:06
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Jayadevan M maymala.jayade...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks. This is what I have. May be it is not really an error?
2013-10-18 12:23:54.996 IST,,,8855,,523c23ea.2297,20,,2013-09-20 16:01:06
IST,,0,LOG,0,received SIGHUP, reloading configuration files,
Le mardi 15 octobre 2013 à 08:52 -0700, ginkgo36 a écrit :
1. I want to sort string follow anphabet and I used this query:
select string_agg(x, ';') from (select
trim(unnest(regexp_split_to_array('ECD FORM; BODY; PREDILUTED; CHROMO-GENIC;
AUTO;RABBIT; FORMAT',';'))) x order by x) a;
--
Thank you for your reply.
In my opinion, that is ugly to the point of uselessness. I think I would
rather just use simple integer arithmetic. It will be easier for others to
understand.
RobR
-Original Message-
From: Merlin Moncure [mailto:mmonc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October
Rob Richardson rdrichard...@rad-con.com writes:
In my opinion, that is ugly to the point of uselessness.
Indeed :-(
For some reason, there's no constructor function to make a box from four
floats. But there is a box constructor that takes two points, as well
as a point constructor that takes
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Rob Richardson rdrichard...@rad-con.com writes:
In my opinion, that is ugly to the point of uselessness.
Indeed :-(
For some reason, there's no constructor function to make a box from four
floats. But there is a box
On 10/18/2013 08:07 AM, Helen Griffiths wrote:
Hello.
I've got a table set up on server B to store the logs from server A, as
outlined in
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/runtime-config-logging.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-LOGGING-CSVLOG
Every day, I set \encoding SQL_ASCII on server B
Hello.
I've got a table set up on server B to store the logs from server A, as
outlined in
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/runtime-config-logging.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-LOGGING-CSVLOG
The table is defined as follows:
postgres=# \d maincluster_log
Table
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:05:07 +0200
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
For some reason, there's no constructor function to make a box from
four floats. But there is a box constructor that takes two points,
as well as a point constructor that takes two floats; so you could do
something like
D'Arcy J.M. Cain da...@druid.net writes:
... In fact, this seems to work already if
quotes are added:
box('(0, 1), (2, 3)')
Well, that's just another spelling for a box literal, which is exactly
what the OP *doesn't* want, since he's trying to construct a box value
from non-constant
Hi,
When we create an index, i believe the postgres engine it self update it's
catalog about the index availability.
ANALYZE helps you to find the right plan according to the number of rows
got selected. I don't think, ANALYZE take care of updating the index
entries.
I might be wrong here, hope
dinesh kumar dineshkuma...@gmail.com writes:
When we create an index, i believe the postgres engine it self update it's
catalog about the index availability.
ANALYZE normally collects statistics about the contents of table columns.
Thus, adding (or removing) an index does not create any reason
Thanks Victor. The states were idle indeed but my application was not
getting the results from that connections back. I have just found that
there were 2 of the threads issuing queries to the same connection in
parallel.
That was the origin of the problem indeed.
Best Regards,
Svetlin Manavski
Hey,
Can you check the line 424855 in the file maincluster-20131011.csv .
Yo may have a comma in unprotected field, or empty field, or wrong end
line, etc.
Cheers,
Rémi -C
2013/10/18 Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.com
On 10/18/2013 08:07 AM, Helen Griffiths wrote:
Hello.
I've got a
Hi,
On 18 Říjen 2013, 17:06, akp geek wrote:
when I issue the top command on solaris, what ever I have posted is
exactly
getting.
top -n
load averages: 11.4, 10.8, 10.2;up 680+21:31:46
15:05:21
137 processes: 123 sleeping, 14 on cpu
CPU states: 82.0% idle, 17.5%
Would a simple multi-column index be considered an 'expression' in this
context, meaning that an ANALYZE should be issued after the creation of such an
index?
---
Pete Yunker
Vice President of Data Products
Home Junction, Inc.
On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Pete Yunker peter.yun...@homejunction.com writes:
Would a simple multi-column index be considered an 'expression' in this
context, meaning that an ANALYZE should be issued after the creation of such
an index?
No. Of course, if one of its columns were an expression, then that would
be of
It looks to me like there's one extra column in the line. There are 8
fields after detail in the log line but only 7 fields after detail in
the table.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.comwrote:
On 10/18/2013 08:07 AM, Helen Griffiths wrote:
Hello.
I've got
I am running Postgres 9.3 on RedHat Linux 5.6.
During the transaction data is deleted from our database, then an analyze is
performed.
If I analyze our database during a transaction and the transaction fails
(rollback occurs), with the table statistics rollback to their original
values?
--
Hi,
In 9.2 docs, the first link (i18ngurus) in the further reading section here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/multibyte.html
seems to be broken. Should it be updated/removed?
(I see it's removed in 9.3 docs)
--
Amit Langote
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Adrian Klaver wrote:
This came up before recently in this thread:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CADK3HHJNEWKD9gNyXmjv9ABbn+37rY3Mvp9=1j7msg9ypob...@mail.gmail.com
To cut to the chase, in that case the OP found:
Ok, I found the offending line. It was not the
Your welcome;
Best wishes for fixes =)
Cheers,
Rémi-C
2013/10/18 Helen Griffiths helen.griffi...@durham.ac.uk
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Adrian Klaver wrote:
This came up before recently in this thread:
http://www.postgresql.org/**message-id/**CADK3HHJNEWKD9gNyXmjv9ABbn+**
On 10/18/13 12:28 PM, bobJobS wrote:
If I analyze our database during a transaction and the transaction fails
(rollback occurs), with the table statistics rollback to their original
values?
Yes.
ANALYZE isn't really that special. It reads data from some tables, does
some math on it, and
I thought this was interesting, and wanted to make sure I understood what
is going on, but the more tests I run the more confused I get.
if I take the exact set up outlined by Mosche I get the same results in 9.3
(as expected) , but if I insert one row before I run the sql the CTE is
executed and
ajeli...@gmail.com wrote
but if I insert one row before I run the sql the CTE is
executed and I get a new row in the table. I was hoping that I would see
a
difference in the explain, but the explain with an empty table where the
CTE is *not* executed is identical to the explain where there
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/10/2013 00:06, Merlin Moncure wrote:
That being said, I do think it might be better behavior (and still
technically correct per the documentation) if volatile query
expressions were force-evaluated.
This
Merlin Moncure-2 wrote
If you wanted to structure the query so that the function was run only
10 times, that could be done trivially by moving the limit inside the
CTE.
It is not trivial if you want to wrap the CTE expression into a VIEW and the
caller of the view only wishes to see/evaluate a
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:08 PM, David Johnston pol...@yahoo.com wrote:
And why is volatile so special here? A stable function seems just as good a
candidate for this behavior and even an immutable one.
Absolutely disagree with this. Stable operations do not have side
effects and volatile
I'm on Debian Wheezy running postgres 9.3
both boxes are identical.
I see in log file on slaves:
LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
OpenSSL is the same version on master and slaves. The libssl is also too.
I set ssl_renegotiation=0. So not sure why i'm seeing
Would help to include the explain(s). Did you ANALYZE after the insert; if
not the planner probably still thought the table was empty (thus the
matching explain) but upon execution realized it had records and thus
needed
to run the CTE.
I did not do an ANALYZE after the insert, I think the plan
Merlin Moncure-2 wrote
Regardless, the point at hand is whether specific plan semantics down
the chain can control whether or not volatile expressions should run.
Clearly, at least to me, they should not.
I don't personally see any solid reason to reject the always evaluate CTEs
with volatile
34 matches
Mail list logo
