Hi durumdara,
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 12:10:52 durumdara wrote:
Another question if I use only SELECTS can I get some Serialization
Error?
No.
For example:
I need a report tool that can show the actual state of the business.
Because of I use value-dependent logic, I MUST use consistent
On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:09:13 Ben Harper wrote:
Hi,
Can anybody explain this:
Records: 600,000
Field Width: Approximately 20 UTF8 characters - type is VARCHAR(25)
Field is Indexed.
SELECT DISTINCT field FROM table;
Takes about 6 seconds. There are 111 distinct items.
On Sqlite, and
Hi,
On Thursday 09 July 2009 19:25:15 Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
Whenever i start a big action, like inserting millions of recs or doing a
large update, the autovacuum fires on top of that.
You can configure autovacuum to use less resources.
On Sunday 12 July 2009 21:07:56 Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
Hi,
I want to judge the performance gain of additional indexes against the
space they consume on disk. Currently I do a VACUUM FULL ANALYZE and
then take the space used by the base directory and do some
calculations. This is time
On Sunday 12 July 2009 13:19:50 Phoenix Kiula wrote:
Hi. I *always* get an error moving my current fully utf-8 database
data into a new DB.
My server has the version 8.3 with a five year old DB. Everything, all
collation, LC_LOCALE etc are all utf8.
When I install a new Postgresql 8.4 on my
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 11:36:57 Jasen Betts wrote:
On 2009-07-13, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On Sunday 12 July 2009 13:19:50 Phoenix Kiula wrote:
Hi. I *always* get an error moving my current fully utf-8 database
data into a new DB.
My server has the version 8.3
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 15:52:29 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andres Freund wrote:
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 11:36:57 Jasen Betts wrote:
if you do an ascii dump and the dump starts out SET CLIENT ENCODING
'UTF8' or similar but you still get errors.
Do you mean that a dump from SQL_ASCII can
On Thursday 16 July 2009 10:53:37 Massa, Harald Armin wrote:
Hello,
I have an old PostgreSQL Database which was created with encoding =
SQL_ASCII. That is an old sin of mine; 9years ago I did not know better.
Now I know better than to use SQL_ASCII.
On the bright side: I am totally sure
On Thursday 16 July 2009 09:02:53 Ms swati chande wrote:
1. Since the value of geqo_threshold is12, does the geqo get automatically
activated for queries with 12 or more joins?
No, not directly. It will get used for 12 joins with no predefined order.
This is a bit complicated by the fact
On Thursday 16 July 2009 19:56:47 William Scott Jordan wrote:
Hey all!
Is there a better way to increase or decrease the value of an integer
than doing something like:
---
UPDATE the_table SET the_int = the_int + 1 WHERE the_id = 123 ;
---
We seem to be getting a lot of deadlocks using
On Thursday 16 July 2009 23:20:34 William Scott Jordan wrote:
Hi Andrew,
That's a very good guess. We are in fact updating this table multiple
times within the same triggered function, which is being called on an
INSERT. Essentially, we're using this to keep a running total of the
number
Hi,
On Monday, August 08, 2011 15:40:20 - - wrote:
explain analyze select * from filter_item where filter_hash = MD5('');
QUERY PLAN
Hi,
On Tuesday 22 Nov 2011 19:01:02 John R Pierce wrote:
On 11/22/11 7:52 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
But I think performance on that table is going to be pretty bad. I
suspect that COPY is going to be your friend here.
indeed. 20M rows/hour is 5500 rows/second. you'd better have a
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:07:23 AM Kirill Müller wrote:
Hi all,
we have a Postgres/PostGIS database with 100+ schemas and 200+ tables in
each schema, generated automatically. When adding a new PostGIS layer in
QGis, the application obviously enumerates all tables, and this takes
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 02:53:06 PM Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 14:44 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:07:23 AM Kirill Müller wrote:
Hi all,
we have a Postgres/PostGIS database with 100+ schemas and 200+ tables
in each schema
On Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:38:23 AM Venkat Balaji wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Scott Marlowe
scott.marl...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Venkat Balaji venkat.bal...@verse.in
all of these 1000 files get filled up in less than 5 mins, there are
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:39:25 AM Condor wrote:
array_accumulate aggregate is:
CREATE AGGREGATE array_accumulate (
sfunc = array_append,
basetype = anyelement,
stype = anyarray,
initcond = '{}'
);
Btw, if you replace that by array_agg which is builtin in any
with postgres 2 anymore as far as I understand
things?
Greetings,
Andres
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 05:41:07 PM Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Andres Freund
and...@2ndquadrant.comwrote:
That shouldn't be a problem with postgres 2 anymore as far as I
understand things?
Argh, postgis 2.
Two things:
* the geometry_columns table
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 06:02:24 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 04:44:14 PM Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
pg_dump -s should use add_geometrycolumn(...) instead of creating a
column+constraints with normal DDL
Because, when you
value?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org
afterwards since the values will be about as bogus. I am more
worried about code that does range checks like java's string conversion
routines...
I think fixing this for 9.4 is fine, but due to the compat issues I
think it's to late for 9.3.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund
need d) and e) anymore and you can
replace it with a regular promotion which will be noticeably faster.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
.
That limit is about max_user_watches, not the general cost of an
fd. Afair they take up a a good more than that. Also, there are global
limits to the amount of filehandles that can simultaneously opened on a
system.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www
On 2013-08-06 19:19:41 +0900, KONDO Mitsumasa wrote:
(2013/08/05 21:23), Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
... Also, there are global
limits to the amount of filehandles that can simultaneously opened on a
system.
Yeah. Raising max_files_per_process puts
me
the time it takes to patch Postgres to do that.
There's an in-development project doing that... Submitted to the last
commitfests and all. Search for changeset extraction et al.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL
follow the public rules.
The likely reason you're seing the problem with the opclasses being
output incompletely is that internal entries don't all have full
dependency information.
What did you actually try to find out?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www
On 2013-09-15 15:24:57 -0400, Eric B. Ridge wrote:
On 09/15/2013 02:11 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
What did you actually try to find out? Greetings, Andres Freund
I was just trying to mentally sync up
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/xindex.html with (more) concrete
examples
chance you
compile with --enable-cassert or somesuch?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes
, which one is it - work_mem or maintenance_work_mem?
Or are these things unrelated?
Yes. One is about the initial index creation, the other about insertions
into an existing index.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development
unlogged tables are modified?
No fsyncs will be issued in the common paths, and they won't be written
to disk by !shutdown checkpoints. But they *will* be written to disk if
there's not enough space in shared_buffers for all the data.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund
On Friday 30 October 2009 15:30:34 Vick Khera wrote:
I really don't think I'm saturating the disk bandwidth. I see spikes
of 18MB/s or more, but it usually hovers at under 3MB/s according to
iostat output.
Looking at the iostat -x output is often more interesting - especially the
utilization
Hi,
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 04:36:10 Yan Cheng Cheok wrote:
I make the following single write operation through pgAdmin :
...
It takes 16ms to write a single row according to Query Editor (bottom
right corner)
In my experience the times presented by pgadmin vary wildly and seldomly do
On Thursday 18 November 2010 05:37:51 Allan Kamau wrote:
Hi,
I am experiencing the row is too big error (with postgreSQL-9.0.1)
when populating a table having a tsquery and tsvector fields.
Are fields of tsquery and tsvector datatypes affected by this row size
restriction?
Looks like you
Hi,
On Saturday, February 26, 2011 12:11:19 AM Gary Fu wrote:
wal_buffers = 16MB
sensible
checkpoint_segments = 256
A setting that high seems unlikely to be beneficial... I suggest you configure
log_checkpoints to monitor this.
effective_cache_size = 30GB
Not likely to matter in this case.
Hi,
On Wednesday 23 February 2011 19:31:58 Gary Fu wrote:
I'm testing on converting a big Sybase db to Pg. It took about 45 hours
to convert all sybase tables (bcp) to Pg (copy) without index and
reference. After that I built the index (one by one, sequentially) and
it took about 25 hours
On Thursday, April 21, 2011 12:16:04 PM Henry C. wrote:
I've done some testing of PostgreSQL on different filesystems, and with
different filesystem mount options.
Since Pg is already journalling, why bother duplicating (and pay the
performance penalty, whatever that penalty may be) the
On Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:44:37 PM Jeff Davis wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 07:29 +0200, pasman pasmański wrote:
Hi. Yesterday i have an idea, that sometimes row locks may be skipped,
when table is already locked with LOCK command. It may to reduce an
overhead from row locks.
What do
On Thursday, April 28, 2011 08:31:09 PM Scott Ribe wrote:
Well, natural keys are quite obviously the way to go, when they exist. The
problem is, they usually don't really exist. What's usually proposed as a
natural key, will upon further investigation, either not be guaranteed
unique, or not
On Monday 12 July 2010 15:29:14 Tom Wilcox wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to configure postgres from SQL?
I am interested in turning off fsync for a set of queries (that take
ages to run) and then turn fsync back on again afterwards.
disabling fsync is nearly never a good idea.
What you can
btw. These days VACUUM FULL does the same
thing CLUSTER does just without sorting.
Greetings,
Andres
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org
process for connection: Cannot allocate memory*
could not fork new process for connection: Cannot allocate memory
and
execute failed: ERROR: out of memory
DETAIL: Failed on request of size 968. [for Statement
SELECT DISTINCT
could you show cat /proc/meminfo?
Greetings,
Andres
--
Andres
to do.
Thats not really possible with freeze vacuums. When the table is older than
the applicable freeze age its scanned completely instead of only the parts
that are sensible according to the vacuum map. The more expensive scans really
only happen when they make sense...
Andres
--
Andres
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:55:40PM -0800, Mike Lewis wrote:
I am trying to make a trigger that updates a row once and only once per
transaction (even if this trigger gets fired multiple times). The general
idea is that for a user we have a version number. When we modify the
user's data, the
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:47:37AM +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:55:40PM -0800, Mike Lewis wrote:
I am trying to make a trigger that updates a row once and only once per
transaction (even
On 2012-11-08 10:47:18 -0800, Tianyin Xu wrote:
(p.s., in the default configuration, all the test suites are passed.)
What did you change?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
to
copy that database not only its owner/superuser.
I think there might be even more unexpected consequences of playing that
trick.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org
13)))
Check the first item of
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/release-9-2.html#AEN110503
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing
can be
pessimal in comparison to a explicit check if only a few values come in,
so this can be checked at runtime after the above commit...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
records in the table while changing to
unlogged.
Nope, thats not enough, won't create the init fork, so your next restart
will probably fail.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
to be functional again.
Setting the timezone to 'localtime' seems to work as well, even without
a patch. I haven't found any documentation about it and I am not
completely sure about the semantics, but it looks ok on a first glance.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund
On 2012-12-16 12:25:13 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Setting the timezone to 'localtime' seems to work as well, even without
a patch. I haven't found any documentation about it and I am not
completely sure about the semantics, but it looks ok on a first
- that's still sub-second
performance (0.176s).
Is that explain from the correct table? According to the results there are
but 53 thousand rows in it, not anywhere near 5 million.
Well, thats the estimate *after* applying the restriction, so that seems
sensible.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
such issues.
Why do you want to do that?
It is not possible to completely disable the usage of toast tables, but
maybe explaining the real reason of you wanting that helps us to give
you another solution.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
On 2013-04-05 15:53:40 +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
On 5 April 2013 15:49, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-04-05 18:32:47 +0530, Zahid Quadri wrote:
Dear admin,
please help me i want to completely disable Toasted tables in postgresql
as per your suggestion i have
) q
Could you show the output of 'bt full'?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
and then do 'print *portal'?
Thanks,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
printtup_prepare_info won't normally be called
in an held cursor. But if some concurrent DDL changed the number of
columns in typeinfo vs thaose in the the receiver that could explain the
issue and why its not seen all the time, right?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http
;
then the second query executes with a portal (and resource owner)
created to execute the FETCH command, not directly on the held portal.
But in that path CurrentResourceOwner gets reset to portal-resowner as
well (see PortalRunFetch())?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund
printtup_prepare_info(myState, typeinfo, natts);
(gdb) print *myState, *myState-attrinfo, *typeinfo
value has been optimized out
Hm. Make that a
print *(DR_printtup *) self
print *((DR_printtup *) self)-attrinfo
print *slot-tts_tupleDescriptor
then.
Thanks,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund
protocol Execute command against a pre-existing portal.
(I had thought psqlOBC went through libpq, but maybe it's playing some
games here.)
Hm. PQexecPrepared() looks like it can do that.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL
On 2013-04-10 19:29:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2013-04-10 19:06:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
And the answer is they're not testing this code path at all, because if
you do
DECLARE c CURSOR WITH HOLD FOR ...
FETCH ALL FROM c;
then the second
,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
in that time. Given the short timeframe it only happens every
now and then.
Did you check the pg_stat_replication view on the primary?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent
Freund in the end of the discussion.
The issues don't look related.
Three
weeks have passed after I installed the patched version and it looks
like the patch fixed my issue.
Oh, cool! Thanks for verifying.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www
will solve your problem.
Note that you need to prevent your type/column from being compressed for
that being effective. Check the storage options for CREATE TABLE et al.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support
multitransaction data used for
shared row locks. Is there some process that can clean these two folder when
the lock is not needed?
Which version are you using? that might be recently (9.3.2 and
corresponding releases) fixed problem.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund
(Consider using an AFTER trigger instead of a
BEFORE trigger to propagate changes to other rows.)));
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
is very slow (due to swapping I guess). Is there any way to tell the
C++ to load rows at batches, without waiting the entire dataset? With Java I
never had these issues before, due to the probably better JDBC driver.
Try looking into either using a serverside cursor or COPY.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
what may have changed? I suspect the solution here is tweaking some LXC
setting, but I was hoping someone can point me in the right direction.
It sounds like you're not allowing posix shared memory. Possibly just by
not mounting /dev/shm.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund
,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql
contents?
My guess is that the CommitLimit is too low...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes
the transfer of the existing dump file.
Any chance there was windows in the mix somewhere? IIRC there were bugs
with large dumps there for a while...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training
If it is what I am guessing at, then the top anonymous address is
probably coming from LWLockAcquire, and those are coming from
HeapTupleSatisfiesMVCC. I don't know how to verify that, though.
Recompile postgres with -fno-omit-frame-pointers and use perf record -g.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
supported by BDR today.
The more complex thing is support for performing transactions that, when
the COMMIT returns successfully, can't have conflicts. That's *not* yet
supported, but we're thinking of implementing it for individual
transactions.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund
On 2014-07-12 13:23:08 +0200, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
12 jul 2014 kl. 12:33 skrev Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com:
On 2014-07-12 18:22:30 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
Any ideas giving BDR an option to be synchronous. I mean
(CAP theorem et al) to make that generally
useful/applicable.
I think we (as in postgres) will probably get the ability to run
individual transactions in such a mode, but you surely wouldn't want to
run every transaction in it.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http
,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql
connects to the right
postgres instance? Did you possibly have a failover or something like that?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql
'.
Could you run, on the standby that's having problems, the following
command:
psql 'host=127.0.0.1 port=5445 user=XXX password=XXX' -c 'IDENTIFY_SYSTEM;'
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training
missing DDL on the
slave.
As Christoph wrote this pretty much is already possible. Even if it
could be prettier. What I'd like to know is what the exact use case you
want it for is. Could you quickly explain?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
pg_replication_identifier_advance(). Which requires some
fiddling around.
It's on our roadmap to make
a) skipping the replication of a transaction easier
b) allow to skip individual problematic actions in a transaction
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
to replicate these.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org
valuable.
Cool!
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
On 2014-09-17 17:46:05 +0530, Dev Kumkar wrote:
On one my machine the pg_multixact directory size has grown up to 5 GB and
am not sure how to clean up this directory.
Which version of postgres are you using?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www
of 'SELECT oid,
datname, relfrozenxid, age(relfrozenxid), relminmxid FROM pg_database;'?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general
On 2014-09-18 22:52:57 +0530, Dev Kumkar wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Dev Kumkar devdas.kum...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I don't think that's relevant for you.
Did you upgrade the database using
think we should get rid of v0 functions. I've seen
errors like this far too many, and they really don't buy us much.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general
planning to add that.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
*great* care that exception, *NEVER* permeate through postgres
code. Doing so will cause bad things.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
the problem. Is this
something that was fixed in 9.3.5?
We have really no information to answer that question accurately.
So you really need to provide logs and such.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support
hangups to keep all the
necessary tuples + ctid chains around.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes
around checkpoints - you could force one
by manually issuing a 'CHECKPOINT;' statement.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general
/postgres -D ...
You should compile postgres with --enable-cassert to debug.
Other wierd thing problem hapens just if input parametar length is 200-255.
256 work fine.
That sounds a bit like it might be toast related. Maybe plv8's parameter
handling isn't entirely correct?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
indicates that
it tries to connect to port 5432 on localhost - but the copy was taken
from 'main_node_ip'. Perhaps you forgot to specify th ehost in the
config?
What does 'git describe --tags' return?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general
configuration it has to be
primary_replica_local_dsn. Could you a) try to explicitly set
unix_socket_directory=/tmp in postgresql.conf and host=/tmp in the above
config?
Also, please attach postgresql.conf.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
Hi,
On 2015-01-13 02:43:26 -0700, deans wrote:
Hi Craig, any insight on this issue? :)
You've, afaics, not posted your configuration. Could you do so?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training
to install/create that view?
It has been renamed since - it's part of postgresql 9.4 and named
pg_replication_slots. It seems most of the page refers to it by the
correct name, just a subsection doesn't... Sorry for that.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www
the
replication slot is being created and false
otherwise. parameteroptions/parameter points to a struct of options
that output plugins can set:
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
On 2015-01-26 15:35:39 -0800, Christophe Pettus wrote:
On Jan 26, 2015, at 2:24 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
What's in the old tuple depends on the configured replica identity.
My apologies, but... configured replica identity?
Search for postgres and replica identity
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
