On 9/12/12 2:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
C is the official name of that locale. Not sure how you got it to say
POSIX ... maybe we didn't have normalization of the locale name back
then?
Says who? I think C and POSIX are distinct locales that just happen to
behave the same way.
--
Sent via
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On 9/12/12 2:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
C is the official name of that locale. Not sure how you got it to say
POSIX ... maybe we didn't have normalization of the locale name back
then?
Says who?
Says setlocale(), at least on the Fedora machine I just
Hi all,
Using centos 5.x
I'm trying to upgrade (without having to dump/restore a 1.5TB db) from 9.0
to 9.2 using pg_upgrade, but am having a few issues.
1. I ran into the (usual?) issue with ld libraries conflicting, so
renamed /etc/ld.so.conf.d/postgresql-9.0-libs.conf to blah, and reran
Hi,
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 20:12 +0200, Henry C. wrote:
1. I ran into the (usual?) issue with ld libraries conflicting, so
renamed /etc/ld.so.conf.d/postgresql-9.0-libs.conf to blah, and reran
ldconfig, then I could initdb the new data/ folder
For the records, I fixed this issue in the
Henry C. he...@cityweb.co.za writes:
2. My 9.0 (old) db is using encoding/Collation/Ctype:
SQL_ASCII/POSIX/POSIX, and for the life of me I cannot initdb the new
(9.2) data/ folder to the same to ensure pg_upgrade works (currently keep
getting old and new cluster lc_collate values do not
C is the official name of that locale. Not sure how you got it to say
POSIX ... maybe we didn't have normalization of the locale name back
then?
Anyway, simplest fix seems to be to update the 9.0 installation's
pg_database to say C in those entries.
Never ceases to amaze me where you guys
Henry C. he...@cityweb.co.za writes:
Anyway, thanks for the feedback. Ok, so it's simply a case of:
update pg_database set datcollate='C', datctype='C';
Correct? Mine are all POSIX, so no where clause needed.
Yeah, that should do it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via
Thanks to all who responded - upgrade was successful!
One final note, when using pg_upgrade ... --link, it finally recommends
use of delete_old_cluster.sh to remove the old data files. I'm tempted,
but --link re-uses old data files,... bit of a contradiction there, if you
follow my meaning?
Is
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:54:57PM +0200, Henry C. wrote:
Thanks to all who responded - upgrade was successful!
One final note, when using pg_upgrade ... --link, it finally recommends
use of delete_old_cluster.sh to remove the old data files. I'm tempted,
but --link re-uses old data
