Re: [GENERAL] Is PL-PGSQL interpreted or complied?

2017-07-06 Thread Tim Uckun
Interesting, thank you. I was curious to know how it worked. Cheers.

Re: [GENERAL] Is PL-PGSQL interpreted or complied?

2017-07-05 Thread Pavel Stehule
2017-07-06 2:10 GMT+02:00 Tim Uckun : > I am curious about the stored proc languages inside of postgres. When I > write a stored proc is it compiled to some internal representation or just > interpreted? How does this work with other languages? > The PLpgSQL proc are saved in

Re: [GENERAL] Is PL-PGSQL interpreted or complied?

2017-07-05 Thread John R Pierce
On 7/5/2017 5:10 PM, Tim Uckun wrote: I am curious about the stored proc languages inside of postgres. When I write a stored proc is it compiled to some internal representation or just interpreted? plpgsql is interpreted directly, I don't believe its even pre-tokenized. How does this work

[GENERAL] Is PL-PGSQL interpreted or complied?

2017-07-05 Thread Tim Uckun
I am curious about the stored proc languages inside of postgres. When I write a stored proc is it compiled to some internal representation or just interpreted? How does this work with other languages? Also would it be possible to extract PL-PGSQL into a standalone (albeit crippled) language? Is