On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 22:41 +0300, Gražvydas Valeika wrote:
What is the problem to provide both plpython2 and plpython3, or keep
same (2 or 3) plpython available by default on both platforms?
It is the decision of the respective packagers which version they
provide and how much effort they want
It is the decision of the respective packagers which version they
provide and how much effort they want to put in. If you have issues
with their decisions, you could try to submit a bug report to their
respective bug trackers.
Btw., Debian and Ubuntu provide PL/Python for Python 2 and 3,
On 09/08/12 9:26 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Personally, I think the Windows packagers made a mistake by providing
Python 3 only at this point.
does the windows package include its own self sufficient python runtime,
or does it rely on a specific 3rd party python being installed ? if
the
does the windows package include its own self sufficient python runtime,
or does it rely on a specific 3rd party python being installed ? if the
latter, is python 2.x available or just 3.x ?
As I understand plpython on windows is only adapter to ActiveState Python
2 or 3. EDB installer
Hi all,
somebody please explain what is packaging policy of plpython. Now I see
plpython2u packaged in Fedora and RHEL repositories and plpython3u in
Windows installer by EnterpriseDB.
Why there is such difference and what is advertised way to keep DB servers
in Linux and Windows plpython
On 09/07/2012 12:41 PM, Gražvydas Valeika wrote:
Hi all,
somebody please explain what is packaging policy of plpython. Now I see
plpython2u packaged in Fedora and RHEL repositories and plpython3u in
Windows installer by EnterpriseDB.
Why there is such difference and what is advertised way to
On 09/07/12 12:41 PM, Gražvydas Valeika wrote:
What is the problem to provide both plpython2 and plpython3, or keep
same (2 or 3) plpython available by default on both platforms?
what version of Python is included in RHEL or Fedora? what version of
Python is included in MS Windows ?
--
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:27 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 09/07/12 12:41 PM, Gražvydas Valeika wrote:
What is the problem to provide both plpython2 and plpython3, or keep same
(2 or 3) plpython available by default on both platforms?
what version of Python is included
On 09/07/12 1:57 PM, Gražvydas Valeika wrote:
I don't use RHEL, I use Scientific Linux clone of it. And
yum.postgresql.org http://yum.postgresql.org/ repository packages.
It contains plpyton2. In Fedora 16 - fedora repostitories, plpython2.
In Windows - Enterprise DB 32 bit installer,
On 09/07/12 2:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
plpython is dependent on python.
minor correction, its dependent on python-libs, but the rest still applies.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
--
Sent via pgsql-general
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:05 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 09/07/12 1:57 PM, Gražvydas Valeika wrote:
I don't use RHEL, I use Scientific Linux clone of it. And
yum.postgresql.org http://yum.postgresql.org/ repository packages. It
contains plpyton2. In Fedora 16 - fedora
On 09/07/12 2:26 PM, Gražvydas Valeika wrote:
OK. It seemed to me, that plpython2 and plpython3 were introduced
exactly for this reason.
Postgres documentation
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/plpython-python23.html)
states:
It is not allowed to use PL/Python based on Python 2
OK. It seemed to me, that plpython2 and plpython3 were introduced exactly
for this reason.
Postgres documentation (http://www.postgresql.org/**
docs/9.1/static/plpython-**python23.htmlhttp://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/plpython-python23.html)
states:
It is not allowed to use
13 matches
Mail list logo
