On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:34:53AM +0200, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
> PostgreSQL *is* a reliable DB.
>
> About checksums in our office master DB that's a fine idea, too bad that
> pg_upgrade doesn't cope with them
> (and upgrading without pg_upgrade is out of the question)
Just to clarify,
Le 10/02/2016 18:08, John R Pierce a écrit :
On 2/10/2016 8:51 AM, Pierre Chevalier Géologue wrote:
PPS: how should I behave on this list: should I systematically "reply
to all", or just "reply" to the list? I'm used to a number of mailing
lists where a simple "reply" automatically replies to
Le 10/02/2016 19:49, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
Go here:
https://mail.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr/domain=postgresql.org?func=lists-long-full=pgsql-general
And in settings check:
eliminatecc
Select this if you do not want two copies when someone sends a
message both to you and to the list.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:10 PM, ioan ghip wrote:
> I have a Firebird SQL database running on one of my servers which has about
> 50k inserts, about 100k updates and about 30k deletes every day. There are
> about 4 million records in 24 tables. I have a bunch of stored
On 02/11/2016 05:42 AM, Pierre Chevalier Géologue wrote:
Le 10/02/2016 19:49, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
Go here:
https://mail.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr/domain=postgresql.org?func=lists-long-full=pgsql-general
And in settings check:
eliminatecc
Select this if you do not want two copies
On 2/9/2016 10:10 PM, ioan ghip wrote:
I have a Firebird SQL database running on one of my servers which has
about 50k inserts, about 100k updates and about 30k deletes every day.
There are about 4 million records in 24 tables. I have a bunch of stored
procedures, triggers, events and views that
Em 10/02/2016 13:32, Andy Colson escreveu:
On 2/9/2016 10:10 PM, ioan ghip wrote:
I have a Firebird SQL database running on one of my servers which has
about 50k inserts, about 100k updates and about 30k deletes every day.
There are about 4 million records in 24 tables. I have a bunch of stored
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:08 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/10/2016 8:51 AM, Pierre Chevalier Géologue wrote:
>
> PPS: how should I behave on this list: should I systematically "reply to
> all", or just "reply" to the list? I'm used to a number of mailing lists
> where a
On 2/10/2016 8:51 AM, Pierre Chevalier Géologue wrote:
PPS: how should I behave on this list: should I systematically "reply
to all", or just "reply" to the list? I'm used to a number of mailing
lists where a simple "reply" automatically replies to the list, and
the rule obliges you to *only*
> Is this running as an embedded engine or a standalone server? One thing
> about Firebird is that since it is embeddable, in that mode other
> application bugs could corrupt the database. In the other case, I would
> expect you may want to run hardware diagnostics to rule out hardware
>
Hello,
Le 10/02/2016 08:43, Chris Travers a écrit :
I have never seen database corruption on PostgreSQL that was not a
result of either:
1. Use cases WAY out of the ordinary (and then only years ago and I
reported a bug on this and it was very quickly fixed)
2. Hardware problems
3. Heat
On 02/10/2016 09:24 AM, David G. Johnston wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:08 AM, John R Pierce >wrote:
On 2/10/2016 8:51 AM, Pierre Chevalier Géologue wrote:
PPS: how should I behave on this list: should I systematically
"reply to
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 01:14:42PM +0200, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
> >>About checksums in our office master DB that's a fine idea, too bad that
> >>pg_upgrade doesn't cope with them
> >I am sure you have considered "failing over" the master to an
> >in-office slave which has got checksums
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:34:53AM +0200, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
PG on tankers:
> About checksums in our office master DB that's a fine idea, too bad that
> pg_upgrade doesn't cope with them
I am sure you have considered "failing over" the master to an
in-office slave which has got
On 10/02/2016 12:40, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:34:53AM +0200, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
PG on tankers:
About checksums in our office master DB that's a fine idea, too bad that
pg_upgrade doesn't cope with them
I am sure you have considered "failing over" the master
On 10/02/2016 06:10, ioan ghip wrote:
I have a Firebird SQL database running on one of my servers which has about 50k inserts, about 100k updates and about 30k deletes every day. There are about 4 million records in 24 tables. I have a
bunch of stored procedures, triggers, events and views that
I have a Firebird SQL database running on one of my servers which has about
50k inserts, about 100k updates and about 30k deletes every day. There are
about 4 million records in 24 tables. I have a bunch of stored procedures,
triggers, events and views that I'm using.
Firebird works fairly well,
Hi;
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 5:10 AM, ioan ghip wrote:
> I have a Firebird SQL database running on one of my servers which has
> about 50k inserts, about 100k updates and about 30k deletes every day.
> There are about 4 million records in 24 tables. I have a bunch of stored
I confirm what Josh berkus said. The performance will not be a problem as
soon as you manage your database very well (good configuration, good
hardware, good queries, good data organisation...), like a lot of other
competitors I think?
We have never used Firebird but we use intensively PostgreSQL
On 02/10/2016 05:10 AM, ioan ghip wrote:
I have a Firebird SQL database running on one of my servers which has
about 50k inserts, about 100k updates and about 30k deletes every day.
There are about 4 million records in 24 tables. I have a bunch of stored
procedures, triggers, events and views
20 matches
Mail list logo