Travis Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this the mod field of the Field class in JDBC2?
Sounds right, but I haven't looked at the JDBC code.
> Does -1 alway mean, for
> numeric types, that the precision is undefined?
Right. In general, -1 is the default typmod if Postgres doesn't have
an
Is this the mod field of the Field class in JDBC2? Does -1 alway mean, for
numeric types, that the precision is undefined? If so, I could patch up
the ResultSet class to function properly. I traced through the
ResultSet code this morning.
Travis Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Consider the following:
> trbauer=# create table t1 (x numberic(3,2));
> trbauer=# \d t1
> Attribute | Type | Modifier
>
> X | numeric(3,2) |
> trbauer=# create view v1 as select x*2 from t1;
> trbauer
Consider the following:
trbauer=# create table t1 (x numberic(3,2));
trbauer=# \d t1
Attribute | Type | Modifier
X | numeric(3,2) |
trbauer=# create view v1 as select x*2 from t1;
trbauer=# \d v1
Attribute | Type | Modifier
---
