At 11:22 PM 29-05-2000 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Lincoln Yeoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is there a pipe method where I can continuously print to/read from?
>
>Not at the moment, but that's obviously going to be a necessary feature
>if we want to make the existing flavor of large objects obsolet
Lincoln Yeoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There's never been much enthusiasm among the core developers for large
>> objects at all --- we see them as a poor substitute for allowing large
>> values directly. (The "TOAST" work scheduled for 7.1 will finally
>> resolve that issue, I hope.) So no
At 01:36 PM 26-05-2000 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Barry Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Does this also mean that if you are using large objects that you really
>> won't be able to store large numbers of large objects in a database?
>> (If I am correct, each large object creates two files, one fo
