Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-12 Thread Glyn Astill
From: Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us To: PostgreSQL-general pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014, 22:56 Subject: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output Someone suggested that 'asciidoc' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format for psql

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:32:32PM -0800, Steve Atkins wrote: On Feb 11, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: Someone suggested that 'asciidoc' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format for psql, similar to the existing output formats of

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:02:29AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: Perhaps, but if we're going to add a text markup format then we'll have to choose one out of many. I personally find Markdown to be more pleasing to the eye than AsciiDoc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markdown

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:48:49AM +0100, Gabriele Bartolini wrote: I second Bruce. I massively use asciidoc. I guess adding both asciidoc and md would not be too hard. Agreed. Assuming there are no objections, I will add it to the TODO list. -- Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2/11/14, 6:25 PM, Vik Fearing wrote: I personally find Markdown to be more pleasing to the eye than AsciiDoc. Markdown can embed HTML tables, so there is nothing that we need to implement. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your

[GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Someone suggested that 'asciidoc' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, latex, and troff. Would this be useful? -- Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us EnterpriseDB

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-11 Thread Vik Fearing
On 02/11/2014 11:56 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Someone suggested that 'asciidoc' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, latex, and troff. Would this be useful? Perhaps, but if we're going to add a text

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-11 Thread Steve Atkins
On Feb 11, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: Someone suggested that 'asciidoc' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, latex, and troff. Would this be useful? Less so than

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-11 Thread Pavel Stehule
2014-02-12 0:25 GMT+01:00 Vik Fearing vik.fear...@dalibo.com: On 02/11/2014 11:56 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Someone suggested that 'asciidoc' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, latex, and troff.

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-11 Thread Gabriele Bartolini
I second Bruce. I massively use asciidoc. I guess adding both asciidoc and md would not be too hard. Thanks, Gabriele -- Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it 2014-02-12 6:02 GMT+01:00 Pavel