Hello Roberto,
On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 10:17 -0500, Roberto Balarezo wrote:
> Hi, I would like to know why this is happening and some advice if
> there is a way to solve this problem:
>
> I have a query like this:
>
> select COALESCE(duedate, ? + 1) from invoices order by duedate desc
> limit 10;
Hi, I would like to know why this is happening and some advice if there is
a way to solve this problem:
I have a query like this:
select COALESCE(duedate, ? + 1) from invoices order by duedate desc limit 10;
where ? is a query parameter. I’m using JDBC to connect to the database,
and sending
El 10/02/17 a las 14:17, Adrian Klaver escribió:
On 02/10/2017 09:09 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi, is there a way to alter a view using *psql*?, something like what
\ef does for functions.
In 9.6:
That's why in 9.1 I didn't find that command...
Hi, is there a way to alter a view using *psql*?, something like what
\ef does for functions.
Regards,
--
Leonardo M. Ramé
Medical IT - Griensu S.A.
Av. Colón 636 - Piso 8 Of. A
X5000EPT -- Córdoba
Tel.: +54(351)4246924 +54(351)4247788 +54(351)4247979 int. 19
Cel.: +54 9 (011) 40871877
--
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Patrick B wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I just wanna understand the locks in a DB server:
> [image: Imagem inline 1]
>
> Access share = Does that mean queries were waiting because an
> update/delete/insert was happening?
>
It would seem more
On 02/10/2017 09:09 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi, is there a way to alter a view using *psql*?, something like what
\ef does for functions.
In 9.6:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/app-psql.html
\ev [ view_name [ line_number ] ]
Regards,
--
Adrian Klaver
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 02:26:18PM -0300, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
> El 10/02/17 a las 14:17, Adrian Klaver escribió:
> > On 02/10/2017 09:09 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
> > > Hi, is there a way to alter a view using *psql*?, something like what
> > > \ef does for functions.
> >
> > In 9.6:
> >
>
On 02/10/2017 01:51 PM, Roberto Balarezo wrote:
Hi,
The parameter defaultDueDate is a java.sql.Date object, an actual Date.
When I run the query with the value in it, it works:
```sql
db=> select COALESCE(duedate, date '2017-02-01' + 1) from invoices order
by duedate desc;
coalesce
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 18:27:30 +
> Rakesh Kumar wrote:
>
>> >Sure, but when you are doing a switchover, the standby is supposed to be
>> >connected to the master when you shutdown
On 02/10/2017 02:14 PM, Roberto Balarezo wrote:
Hmmm... I didn't know PostgreSQL had a facility for query logging and
debugging of parameters to a logfile. Thought I had to execute a
describe or something like that. Thanks, I'll try it to see what's
happening!
Start here:
On Feb 10, 2017 8:11 PM, "Roberto Balarezo" wrote:
Hi, I would like to know why this is happening and some advice if there is
a way to solve this problem:
I have a query like this:
select COALESCE(duedate, ? + 1) from invoices order by duedate desc limit 10;
where ? is a
On 02/10/2017 07:17 AM, Roberto Balarezo wrote:
Hi, I would like to know why this is happening and some advice if there
is a way to solve this problem:
I have a query like this:
|select COALESCE(duedate, ? + 1) from invoices order by duedate desc
limit 10; |
What is the 1 in ? + 1 supposed
On 02/10/2017 01:33 PM, Arjen Nienhuis wrote:
On Feb 10, 2017 8:11 PM, "Roberto Balarezo" > wrote:
Hi, I would like to know why this is happening and some advice if
there is a way to solve this problem:
I have a query like this:
In short - this is the wrong list (pgsql-j...@postgresql.org is the
appropriate one; or the official GitHub repo) and you need to provide some
working self-contained examples showing exactly what you are doing.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Roberto Balarezo
wrote:
> Hi,
Hello Roberto,
On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 16:43 -0500, Roberto Balarezo wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Thanks for your answer. The query is just an example I made to
> illustrate the problem. In the database I'm working with, duedate is
> a timestamp without timezone column, which can contain null values.
> The
I have two databases being replicated across three nodes with bdr. The
third node filled up and crashed. I removed this node from the group
successfully, but now I'm having trouble rejoining it. I'm able to re-join
the one database no problem. However, trying to do a bdr join on the other
causes
On 09/02/17 23:00, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Thomas Güttler (guettl...@thomas-guettler.de):
Is running linux with postgres on eMMC a bad idea in general?
I'd say that running anything with a read-write load on eMMC will
end in pieces. It's ok to occasionally write something, but a
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 18:27:30 +
Rakesh Kumar wrote:
> >Sure, but when you are doing a switchover, the standby is supposed to be
> >connected to the master when you shutdown the master. So based on the doc,
> >the standby should receive **everything** from the master
> I was wondering if there was any way to break down the creation of a new
> exclusion constraint into stages such that table locks most likely to affect
> performance during production hours are not taken.
>
> Something like:
>
> CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY new_index ON my_table USING gist
Peter J. Holzer schrieb am 10.02.2017 um 14:02:
> So it's doing a sequential scan on the initial select in the recursive
> CTE, but using the index on the subsequent selects.
>
> But why? If it uses the index on
> SELECT MIN(periodizitaet) FROM facttable_imf_ifs WHERE periodizitaet > 'x'
>
>> Kill ? You mean "pg_ctl stop -m fast" right ?
Yes.
>Use timeline to resync ? Timeline is an internal mechanism in PostgreSQL, not
>a tool, so I don't get this step...You mean using pg_rewind ?
pg_rewind which uses timeline.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
Hi, I'm reading about Grouping Sets/Rollup/Cube and I wonder which
js/html5 library allows displaying *easily* (without having to re-format
it) the returned data from those functions.
Regards,
--
Leonardo M. Ramé
Medical IT - Griensu S.A.
Av. Colón 636 - Piso 8 Of. A
X5000EPT -- Córdoba
Tel.:
I was almost through writing a bug report when I figured out what I was
doing wrong, so I'll post it here in the hope that it prevents someone
from tearing their hair out.
I was trying to use a loose index scan as described on
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Loose_indexscan on a column with just
On 2017-02-10 14:24:36 +0100, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Peter J. Holzer schrieb am 10.02.2017 um 14:02:
> > So it's doing a sequential scan on the initial select in the recursive
> > CTE, but using the index on the subsequent selects.
> >
> > But why? If it uses the index on
> > SELECT
24 matches
Mail list logo