Kevin Grittner wrote:
> On the other hand, try connecting to a database with
> psql and typing:
>
> \h create index
>
> ... (or any other command name). The help you get there is fished
> out of the docs.
BTW I noticed a few days ago that we don't have a "where BLAH can be one
of" section for
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Jerome Wagner wrote:
> I am doing some research on postgres sql query parsing.
> I was wondering what people think of the conformance with regards to the
> real parser of the documentations on
> -
> What problem are you trying to solve here? to whit not everything that
can be parsed is documented - usually intentionally.
I am tyring to see whether we could use the documentation as a kind of
formal specification of the language but I understand that the devil is
in the details and that
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Jerome Wagner
wrote:
>
> Would it make sense to use these sgml synopsis as some kind of source of
> truth, parse them, and automatically generate a parser for a specifc
> language ?
>
What problem are you trying to solve here? to
Jerome Wagner writes:
> Would it make sense to use these sgml synopsis as some kind of source of
> truth, parse them, and automatically generate a parser for a specifc
> language ?
Probably not. First, it is not uncommon for corner cases (such as
legacy syntaxes) to