On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 12/17/2017 07:32 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Making it use GUC_UNIT_S seems like a good idea to me, but removing
>> the mention of seconds from the description doesn't seem like a good
>> idea to me.
>
> I took for my
On 12/17/2017 07:32 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Making it use GUC_UNIT_S seems like a good idea to me, but removing
> the mention of seconds from the description doesn't seem like a good
> idea to me.
I took for my model a quick survey of existing GUCs that use
GUC_UNIT_(MS|S|MIN) - most of which
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Chapman Flack wrote:
> Would this sample code make an even better teaching example if it
> used the existing GUC way to declare that worker_spi.naptime is
> in units of seconds?
>
> Or does it not do that for some reason I've overlooked?
Would this sample code make an even better teaching example if it
used the existing GUC way to declare that worker_spi.naptime is
in units of seconds?
Or does it not do that for some reason I've overlooked?
-Chap
>From 50fd326e5c1ff033c701f90ce09ab9b15d600593 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: