Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held when calling PageGetLSN()

2017-11-08 Thread Asim Praveen
Hi Michael On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Did you really test WAL replay? This still ignores that PageGetLSN is > as well taken in some code paths, like recovery, where actions on the > page are guaranteed to be serialized, like during

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held when calling PageGetLSN()

2017-11-06 Thread Asim Praveen
Hi Michael On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Jacob, here are some ideas to make this thread move on. I would > suggest to produce a set of patches that do things incrementally: > 1) One patch that changes the calls of PageGetLSN to >