Re: [HACKERS] Patch: add --if-exists to pg_recvlogical

2017-09-20 Thread Rosser Schwarz
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 9/17/17 18:21, Rosser Schwarz wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut > > <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com > > <mailto:peter.eisentr..

Re: [HACKERS] Patch: add --if-exists to pg_recvlogical

2017-09-17 Thread Rosser Schwarz
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I understand the --drop-slot part. But I don't understand what it means > to ignore a missing replication slot when running --start. I'm not sure I do either, honestly. I followed the Principle of

Re: [HACKERS] Patch: add --if-exists to pg_recvlogical

2017-09-15 Thread Rosser Schwarz
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 04:15 Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > This patch is "Waiting for Author” due to the above review comments from > Peter > and Thomas. Do you think you will have time to address these shortly so > we can > move this patch further in the process? I have a

Re: [HACKERS] Patch: add --if-exists to pg_recvlogical

2017-08-26 Thread Rosser Schwarz
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Rosser Schwarz > <rosser.schw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > While doing some scripting around pg_recvlogical at $work, I found a need > > for $subject. Attache

[HACKERS] Patch: add --if-exists to pg_recvlogical

2017-05-21 Thread Rosser Schwarz
Hackers, While doing some scripting around pg_recvlogical at $work, I found a need for $subject. Attached, find a patch to that effect. I tried simply to mirror the logic used elsewhere. I don't think there's anything controversial here, but welcome any comments or suggestions. This applies and

Re: [HACKERS] Unexpected data beyond EOF during heavy writes

2010-05-20 Thread Rosser Schwarz
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote: We (at Command Prompt) researched this recently for another setup and the common point you both have is NetApp.  I then wondered about a bug in NetApp driver or NFS client implementation. It's definitely not (just)

[HACKERS] beginning hackers (was: indexes spanning multiple tables)

2005-08-22 Thread Rosser Schwarz
while you weren't looking, Tom Lane wrote: [indexes spanning multiple tables] Wouldn't recommend it as a project for a beginning backend hacker; the locking considerations alone are a bit daunting. That being the case, is there a list anywhere of open/wish list/TODO items that are suitable

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company

2005-05-02 Thread Rosser Schwarz
while you weren't looking, I wrote: [...] Gah. s/committe/committee/ /rls -- :wq ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company

2005-05-02 Thread Rosser Schwarz
while you weren't looking, Bruce Momjian wrote: Adjustments? A couple slight tweaks and rephrasings: pIf you're looking for a PostgreSQL gatekeeper, central committe or controlling company, give up; there isn't one. We do have a core committe and don't hand out CVS commit privileges like