Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve pg_dump regression tests and code coverage

2017-03-20 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > To be clear, I am not asking for any kind of special exception for > myself. > > I continue to be of the opinion that this entire discussion is quite > flipped from how we really should be running things- adding

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve pg_dump regression tests and code coverage

2017-03-20 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > While I certainly agree with that when it comes to new features, changes > in work-flow, bug fixes and other things, I'm really not sure that > requiring posting to the list and waiting for responses every time > someone

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve pg_dump regression tests and code coverage

2017-03-20 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >> So was this 3340 line patch posted or discussed anyplace before it got >> committed? > > I've mentioned a few times that I'm working on improving pg_dump > regression tests