Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)

2017-10-02 Thread Alexander Korotkov
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Shubham Barai wrote: > Yes, page-level predicate locking should happen only when fast update is > off. > Actually, I forgot to put conditions in updated patch. Does everything > else look ok ? > I think that isolation tests should be

Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)

2017-10-01 Thread Shubham Barai
On 1 October 2017 at 01:47, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Shubham Barai > wrote: > >> I have made changes according to your suggestions. Please have a look at >> the updated patch. >> I am also considering your

Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)

2017-09-30 Thread Alexander Korotkov
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Shubham Barai wrote: > I have made changes according to your suggestions. Please have a look at > the updated patch. > I am also considering your suggestions for my other patches also. But, I > will need some time to > make changes as I

Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)

2017-09-30 Thread Shubham Barai
Sent with Mailtrack <#> On 28 September 2017 at 15:49, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Alexander Korotkov < >

Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)

2017-09-28 Thread Alexander Korotkov
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Alexander Korotkov < a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Shubham Barai > wrote: > >> Please find the updated patch for predicate locking in gin index here. >> >> There was a small issue in the previous

Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)

2017-09-27 Thread Alexander Korotkov
Hi! On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Shubham Barai wrote: > Please find the updated patch for predicate locking in gin index here. > > There was a small issue in the previous patch. I didn't consider the case > where only root page exists in the tree, and there is a

Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)

2017-08-09 Thread Shubham Barai
Hi, Please find the updated patch for predicate locking in gin index here. There was a small issue in the previous patch. I didn't consider the case where only root page exists in the tree, and there is a predicate lock on it, and it gets split. If we treat the original page as a left page and

Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)

2017-07-17 Thread Shubham Barai
Hi, I am attaching a patch for predicate locking in gin index. Regards, Shubham Sent with Mailtrack On 11 July 2017 at 19:10, Shubham Barai wrote: > Project:

[HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)

2017-07-11 Thread Shubham Barai
Project: Explicitly support predicate locks in index AMs besides b-tree I have done following tasks during this week. 1) worked on how to detect rw conflicts when fast update is enabled 2) created tests for different gin operators 3) went through some patches on commitfest to review 4)