Re: [HACKERS] Minor comment update in setrefs.c

2016-03-08 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > The point in the previous patch was to update the list of expressions to be > adjusted for the case of scanrelid=0 like that for the case of scanrelid>0 > case in set_foreignscan_references. So, I'd like to

Re: [HACKERS] Minor comment update in setrefs.c

2016-01-15 Thread Etsuro Fujita
On 2015/12/11 2:21, Robert Haas wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote: Attached is a small patch to adjust a comment in setrefs.c; in set_foreignscan_references, fdw_recheck_quals also gets adjusted to reference foreign scan tuple, in case of a

Re: [HACKERS] Minor comment update in setrefs.c

2015-12-10 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > Attached is a small patch to adjust a comment in setrefs.c; in > set_foreignscan_references, fdw_recheck_quals also gets adjusted to > reference foreign scan tuple, in case of a foreign join, so I added > "etc.",

[HACKERS] Minor comment update in setrefs.c

2015-12-08 Thread Etsuro Fujita
Hi, Attached is a small patch to adjust a comment in setrefs.c; in set_foreignscan_references, fdw_recheck_quals also gets adjusted to reference foreign scan tuple, in case of a foreign join, so I added "etc.", to a comment there, as the comment in case of a simple foreign table scan. Best