Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums

2017-10-31 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
This is just a repost as a (true) new thread. At Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:57:50 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote in <20171030.205750.246076862.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > At Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:15:16 +0900, Masahiko Sawada

Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums

2017-10-30 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
At Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:06:30 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote in <20171026.150630.115694437.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > At Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:15:16 +0900, Masahiko Sawada > wrote in

Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums

2017-10-26 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Mmm. I've failed to create a brand-new thread.. Thank you for the comment. At Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:15:16 +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote in

Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums

2017-10-20 Thread Masahiko Sawada
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > Hello. > Once in a while I am asked about table bloat. In most cases the > cause is long lasting transactions and vacuum canceling in some > cases. Whatever the case users don't have enough clues to why >

[HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums

2017-10-10 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Hello. Once in a while I am asked about table bloat. In most cases the cause is long lasting transactions and vacuum canceling in some cases. Whatever the case users don't have enough clues to why they have bloated tables. At the top of the annoyances list for users would be that they cannot know