[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table

2017-06-11 Thread Joe Conway
On 06/09/2017 02:52 PM, Joe Conway wrote: > On 06/09/2017 06:16 AM, Joe Conway wrote: >> On 06/08/2017 11:09 PM, Noah Misch wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 08:45:20AM -0700, Joe Conway wrote: On 06/07/2017 06:49 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote: > I ended up narrowing it down to 4 tables (one

[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table

2017-06-09 Thread Joe Conway
On 06/09/2017 06:16 AM, Joe Conway wrote: > On 06/08/2017 11:09 PM, Noah Misch wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 08:45:20AM -0700, Joe Conway wrote: >>> On 06/07/2017 06:49 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote: >>> > I ended up narrowing it down to 4 tables (one parent and 3 partitions) >>> > in order to

[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table

2017-06-09 Thread Joe Conway
On 06/08/2017 11:09 PM, Noah Misch wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 08:45:20AM -0700, Joe Conway wrote: >> On 06/07/2017 06:49 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote: >> > I ended up narrowing it down to 4 tables (one parent and 3 partitions) >> > in order to demonstrate policy sorting and order of

[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table

2017-06-09 Thread Noah Misch
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 08:45:20AM -0700, Joe Conway wrote: > On 06/07/2017 06:49 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote: > > I ended up narrowing it down to 4 tables (one parent and 3 partitions) > > in order to demonstrate policy sorting and order of RLS/partition > > constraint checking. It should be much

[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table

2017-06-07 Thread Joe Conway
On 06/07/2017 06:49 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote: > I ended up narrowing it down to 4 tables (one parent and 3 partitions) > in order to demonstrate policy sorting and order of RLS/partition > constraint checking. It should be much more straight-forward now, but > let me know if there are any further

[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table

2017-06-06 Thread Joe Conway
On 06/06/2017 02:44 PM, Mike Palmiotto wrote: > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Joe Conway wrote: >> On 06/06/2017 11:57 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote: On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Joe Conway

[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table

2017-06-06 Thread Joe Conway
On 06/06/2017 11:57 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Joe Conway wrote: >>> Unless Robert objects, I'll work with Mike to get a fix posted and >>> committed in the next

[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table

2017-06-05 Thread Joe Conway
On 06/04/2017 03:33 PM, Noah Misch wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:28:16AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Mike Palmiotto >> wrote: >> > This is indeed a bug. fireRIRrules is currently skipping the RLS >> > policy check when