Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers

2017-03-07 Thread David Rowley
On 8 March 2017 at 09:32, Robert Haas wrote: > Committed. Thanks! -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make

Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers

2017-03-07 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:02 AM, David Rowley > wrote: >> On 7 March 2017 at 15:21, Amit Kapila wrote: >>> +1. How about changing the description of >>>

Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers

2017-03-07 Thread Amit Kapila
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:02 AM, David Rowley wrote: > On 7 March 2017 at 15:21, Amit Kapila wrote: >> +1. How about changing the description of >> max_parallel_workers_per_gather to "taken from max_worker_processes, >> limited by

Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers

2017-03-06 Thread David Rowley
On 7 March 2017 at 15:21, Amit Kapila wrote: > +1. How about changing the description of > max_parallel_workers_per_gather to "taken from max_worker_processes, > limited by max_parallel_workers"? Thanks for looking. Seems more accurate to say that it's "taken from

Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers

2017-03-06 Thread Amit Kapila
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:39 AM, David Rowley wrote: > While scanning over postgresql.conf I happened to notice something > that didn't ring quite true about max_parallel_workers. The comment > confuses worker_processes with parallel workers. > +1. How about

[HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers

2017-03-06 Thread David Rowley
While scanning over postgresql.conf I happened to notice something that didn't ring quite true about max_parallel_workers. The comment confuses worker_processes with parallel workers. The attached aims to put this right. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL