Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - possible remaining problem

2017-06-07 Thread Petr Jelinek
Hi, On 07/06/17 22:49, Erik Rijkers wrote: > I am not sure whether what I found here amounts to a bug, I might be > doing something dumb. > > During the last few months I did tests by running pgbench over logical > replication. Earlier emails have details. > > The basic form of that now works

Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - possible remaining problem

2017-06-07 Thread Erik Rijkers
On 2017-06-07 23:18, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Erik Rijkers wrote: Now, looking at the script again I am thinking that it would be reasonable to expect that after issuing delete from pg_subscription; the other 2 tables are /also/ cleaned, automatically, as a consequence. (Is this

Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - possible remaining problem

2017-06-07 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Erik Rijkers wrote: > Now, looking at the script again I am thinking that it would be reasonable > to expect that after issuing >delete from pg_subscription; > > the other 2 tables are /also/ cleaned, automatically, as a consequence. (Is > this reasonable? this is really the main question

[HACKERS] logical replication - possible remaining problem

2017-06-07 Thread Erik Rijkers
I am not sure whether what I found here amounts to a bug, I might be doing something dumb. During the last few months I did tests by running pgbench over logical replication. Earlier emails have details. The basic form of that now works well (and the fix has been comitted) but as I looked