Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: evaluate placeholdervars on remote server

2017-09-26 Thread Etsuro Fujita
On 2017/09/16 0:19, Robert Haas wrote: On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: Have you had a chance to look at this such that we can expect a rebased version of this patch during the commitfest? Frankly, I think things where there was a ping multiple

Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: evaluate placeholdervars on remote server

2017-09-15 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 15 Sep 2017, at 17:19, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> Have you had a chance to look at this such that we can expect a rebased >> version >> of this patch during the commitfest? > > Frankly, I

Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: evaluate placeholdervars on remote server

2017-09-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > Have you had a chance to look at this such that we can expect a rebased > version > of this patch during the commitfest? Frankly, I think things where there was a ping multiple weeks before the CommitFest started and

Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: evaluate placeholdervars on remote server

2017-09-15 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 15 Aug 2017, at 01:00, Peter Eisentraut > wrote: > > On 4/3/17 22:00, Etsuro Fujita wrote: >> On 2017/04/04 3:21, Andres Freund wrote: >>> On 2017-02-28 21:45:22 +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote: Here is a patch for $subject. >>> >>> This is a nontrivial

Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: evaluate placeholdervars on remote server

2017-08-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 4/3/17 22:00, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > On 2017/04/04 3:21, Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2017-02-28 21:45:22 +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote: >>> Here is a patch for $subject. >> >> This is a nontrivial patch, submitted just before the start of the last >> CF for postgres 10. Therefore I think we should

Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: evaluate placeholdervars on remote server

2017-04-03 Thread Etsuro Fujita
On 2017/04/04 3:21, Andres Freund wrote: On 2017-02-28 21:45:22 +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote: Here is a patch for $subject. This is a nontrivial patch, submitted just before the start of the last CF for postgres 10. Therefore I think we should move this to the next CF. Honestly, I'm not

Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: evaluate placeholdervars on remote server

2017-04-03 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2017-02-28 21:45:22 +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > Here is a patch for $subject. This is a nontrivial patch, submitted just before the start of the last CF for postgres 10. Therefore I think we should move this to the next CF. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

[HACKERS] postgres_fdw: evaluate placeholdervars on remote server

2017-02-28 Thread Etsuro Fujita
Hi, Here is a patch for $subject. This is the same as what I proposed in combination with a feature for full joins [1]; this would allow us to push down left/right/full joins with PHVs to the remote and improve how to deparse whole-row references. Since this is implemented on top of