Hi Bruce,
You obviosuly missed my recent posting advertising the homepage
of Konstantin Knizhnik?
Make sure to have a look: http://www.garret.ru/~knizhnik/
You find there -everything- concerning multiplatform IPC,
threading and even some extraordinary, complete database
backends that are
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 07:18, Tom Lane wrote:
I've been having a lot of fun here at the SIGMOD annual conference,
attaching faces to names like Stonebraker, Hellerstein, Aoki,
Seltzer (if these do not ring a bell, you ain't read enough Postgres
source code lately). I felt I had to pass along
Hi.
On Thu, 06 Jun 2002 16:23:29 +0930
Steven Vajdic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to get read of those "defunct" processes?
What version of cygipc and cygwin do you use?
---
Yutaka tanida[EMAIL PROTECTED]
$BFf$N(BWebsite http://www.hi-net.zaq.ne.jp/yutaka/
---(end
Jan Wieck wrote:
One solution is to return to that for Win32 only, so instead of doing:
initialization()
want for connection()
fork backend()
we do for Win32:
want for connection()
exec backend()
initialization()
Summarizes pretty much what we
Steven,
I found the following snippet in MSDN under CreateProcess:
The created process remains in the system until all threads within the
process have terminated and all handles to the process and any of its
threads have been closed through calls to CloseHandle. The handles for both
the process
Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rant
One thing I think we have stripped too much is time travel.
Actually, I was just discussing that at last night's dinner with someone
whose name I forget at the moment (I have his card, but not on me).
He claimed to know how to support time travel as
Patch to contrib/intarray is attached to this message.
Please apply it to 7.2 and CVS
Regards,
Oleg
_
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University
Lincoln Yeoh writes:
However raw control characters can still cause problems in the various
stages from the source to the DB.
I still don't see why. You are merely speculating about implementation
fallacies that aren't there.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Momjian writes:
Lots of our code requires a unix shell and utilities. Will we continue
using cygwin for this?
We should probably get rid of using shell scripts for application programs
altogether, for a number of reasons besides this one, such as the
inability to properly handle input
Folks,
If I might just say ... I think it's phenominal that somebody has
started working on the PGAccess code again and I really look forward to
testing (and documenting!) your work.
If you don't read the Novice list, new Postgres users have been dying
for a PGAccess update for the last year.
Thanks Josh,
Good, encouraging words. There are two mailing lists - please feel free to
make them popular -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Both are run on qmail/ezmlm, for help send a blank e-mail to -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The lists are not moderated. Please,
Iavor Raytchev wrote:
pgaccess has no meaning outside PostgreSQL. We do not try to steal it or
take it over,... One day I should write a page how the whole things started,
so that I do not have to explain it every time.
I have not heard --- where are you going to keep the master CVS?
--
Dann Corbit wrote:
I apologize for my English language message. I am unable to speak
Japanese. We do have a native Japanese speaker here, who could be
called upon if necessary.
There is no need to aplogize writing an e-mail in English.
It's global standards, but some portion is a bit
Dann Corbit wrote:
TODO reverted to be:
Add BSD-licensed qsort() for Solaris
My guess is that your test case didn't tickle the bug.
I am the author of several special sort functions [I wrote the sorting
chapter in this book: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton/unleashed/].
I
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
Lots of our code requires a unix shell and utilities. Will we continue
using cygwin for this?
We should probably get rid of using shell scripts for application programs
altogether, for a number of reasons besides this one, such as the
Yes it's speculation. The implementation at the DB isn't there, neither are
the associated DBD/JDBC/ODBC drivers for it.
Basically if the fallacies aren't in postgresql _if_ the decision is to
implement it, I'd be happy.
I was just noting (perhaps superfluously) that backspaces and friends
Hi Michael/Yutaka,
Thanks for your reply.
I discovered the cause of the problem (I think) - I just do not know why
it happens.
PROBLEM (again): DEFUNCT processes under Win2K not seen under Win98.
I am running cygwin-2.125.2.10 (postgresql 7.1) and cigipc-1.11-1
installed in Jan 2002.
Prior
Tom Lane wrote:
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why should we rely on broken glibc and the standard? Why don't we make
our own mktime() and use it on all platforms.
The downside to doing that is that we then take over maintenance of the
code and, more importantly, the
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday 21 May 2002 11:04 am, Manuel Sugawara wrote:
I see. This behavior is consistent with the fact that mktime is
supposed to return -1 on error, but then is broken in every other Unix
implementation that I
Tom Lane wrote:
Definitely better. I'd suggest also thinking about whether the
same/similar macros can support functions that return a set of a
scalar (non-tuple) datatype. In my mind, the cleanest design would
be some base macros that support functions-returning-set (of anything),
and if
Tom Lane wrote:
Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) add SASL. This is a new standards-track protocol that is often
described as PAM for network authentication. PostgreSQL could
remove *all* protocol-specific authentication code and use
standard plug-in libraries instead.
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Since we now have an official entry in /etc/services, shouldn't we be able
to make use of it, by using getservbyname() if a nonnumeric port number is
specified?
Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/services?
--
Bruce Momjian|
Tom Lane wrote:
Manfred Koizar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No comment on a planned 7.3 timeframe? :-(
I think we are planning to go beta in late summer (end of August, say).
Probably in July we'll start pressing people to finish up any major
development items, or admit that they won't
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Since we now have an official entry in /etc/services, shouldn't we be able
to make use of it, by using getservbyname() if a nonnumeric port number is
specified?
Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/services?
NetBSD will
Tom Lane wrote:
Manfred Koizar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what about WITHOUT OIDS? I know dropping the OID from some tables and
keeping it for others is not trivial, because t_oid is the _first_
field of HeapTupleHeaderData. I'm vaguely considering a few possible
implementations and
25 matches
Mail list logo
