On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 04:41:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How about we add the preproc.c file generated by bison 1.49 to cvs?
> > Could that create problems elsewhere?
>
> Yes. It's a bad idea to put derived files in CVS. For one thing,
> CVS wi
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 02:12:45PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Are we the only ones up against this problem? Hard to imagine we are
No, there are more, that's why bison is worked on.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 01:57:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> That would be trouble, but considering that we are not even thinking of
> going beta before late August, is it really a realistic risk? bison
Yes. After all it's much easier to sync the two if I get smaller
changes.
> seems to be maki
