On Saturday 29 June 2002 08:14 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Launching VACUUMs on some automatic schedule, preferably using feedback
> about where space needs to be reclaimed, seems like a pretty
> straightforward small-matter-of-programming. The thing that would
> really be needed to make it unobtrusive
On Sat, 2002-06-29 at 21:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> "J. R. Nield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I do not think that is the case; and anyway we've pretty much rejected
> >> Vadim's notion of going to an Oracle-style UNDO buffer.
>
> > Could someone point me to this discussion, or summarize what the
Tom Lane wrote:
> "J. R. Nield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I do not think that is the case; and anyway we've pretty much rejected
> >> Vadim's notion of going to an Oracle-style UNDO buffer.
>
> > Could someone point me to this discussion, or summarize what the problem
> > was?
>
> I'm too
"J. R. Nield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I do not think that is the case; and anyway we've pretty much rejected
>> Vadim's notion of going to an Oracle-style UNDO buffer.
> Could someone point me to this discussion, or summarize what the problem
> was?
I'm too lazy to dig through the archive
On Sat, 2002-06-29 at 20:14, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Matthew T. O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Second: There was some discussion
> > (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-05/msg00970.php) about
> > this not being neede once UNDO is on place, what is the current view on this?
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As of 7.2 we have lazy vacuum. The next logical step is setting up vacuum to
> run automatically in the background either as some type of daemon or as
> something kicked off by the postmaster.
> I am interested in working on this to do item, a
>From the ToDo list:
Vacuum: * Provide automatic running of vacuum in the background (Tom)
As of 7.2 we have lazy vacuum. The next logical step is setting up vacuum to
run automatically in the background either as some type of daemon or as
something kicked off by the postmaster.
I am
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido Ostkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I am sure, a lot of people would be happy, if those groups were
>> officially introduced and hosted on many international newservers.
>
> Yup. Are you volunteering to be the proponent who shepherds a vote
> throug
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday 28 June 2002 10:46 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Guido Ostkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I am sure, a lot of people would be happy, if those groups were
> > > officially introduced and hosted on many international newservers.
>
> > Yup. Are yo
