Re: Release of v7.2.2 (Was: Re: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs ad...)

2002-08-22 Thread Tom Lane
Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It probably makes sense to wait about a week until releasing 7.2.2, even > if we get assembled anything else that is needed. I think we should go ahead and push it out; by the end of next week we'll be trying to wrap 7.3 beta, and the confusion factor fo

Re: Release of v7.2.2 (Was: Re: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs ad...)

2002-08-22 Thread Justin Clift
Hi everyone, It probably makes sense to wait about a week until releasing 7.2.2, even if we get assembled anything else that is needed. Sir Mordred appears to be taking a look through our 7.2.x code about now and that probably means there's a good chance we'll hear of other patches that will nee

Re: Release of v7.2.2 (Was: Re: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs ad...)

2002-08-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Thanks, Tom. That is a big help. I will do the release history and version stamping. --- Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Are we all caught up now on the known bugs/fixes? Would it be r

Re: Release of v7.2.2 (Was: Re: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs ad...)

2002-08-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
I was going to ask that too. I need to make up a list of 7.2.2 changes, and there are quite a number of them. I will get the list together today. --- Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Are we all caught up now on the known bugs

Re: Release of v7.2.2 (Was: Re: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs ad...)

2002-08-22 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Tom, I think it's worth to include patch for query planner which fixes using indices with predicates for join plans. We found it's quite useful. http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1018153 Oleg On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write

Re: [HACKERS] Release of v7.2.2

2002-08-22 Thread Sir Mordred The Traitor
>"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are we all caught up now on the known bugs/fixes? Would it be reasonably > safe to do up a quick v7.2.2 Security Fix Release tomorrow afternoon? Maybe it makes sense to wait about a week. __

Re: Release of v7.2.2 (Was: Re: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs ad...)

2002-08-22 Thread Tom Lane
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are we all caught up now on the known bugs/fixes? Would it be reasonably > safe to do up a quick v7.2.2 Security Fix Release tomorrow afternoon? Still need to do a release-history entry and version-stamp, of course. I will do a diff of the 7.2 bra

Re: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in

2002-08-22 Thread Florian Weimer
Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It would be perhaps one of the most impressive hacks ever if someone > could dream machine code to put in the overrun which consisted > entirely of printable characters. At least for the x86 architecture, working ASCII-only shell code exists (even shell

[HACKERS] Please, apply patch

2002-08-22 Thread Teodor Sigaev
Please, apply patch for tsearch to current CVS. Patch resolve ERROR problem for non-goog query_txt. Teodor Sigaev wrote: > Now you can use: > regression=# select 'the'::mquery_txt; > ERROR: Your query contained only stopword(s), ignored > regression=# select 'good'::mquery_txt; > mquery_txt >

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming Beta

2002-08-22 Thread Sir Mordred The Traitor
Hi. There is no need to ask me to attack a postgresql source code, as long as i remember myself, i was always in studing someone's source code or disasm output.. By the way, the code i write being a plain web programmer, even for small projects is fairly buggy:-))). One little thing saves me a bit

Re: [HACKERS] @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in

2002-08-22 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
> > Ok, now I vote, that you don't implement "any" and use "opaque". > > I don't think we want two types that do the same thing. > > Is it that you like the name "any" more than "opaque" ? > > No, it's that I want to deprecate "opaque" so that we can catch old > uses that should not be there any

Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed

2002-08-22 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 22 August 2002 03:28 > To: Vince Vielhaber; Marc G. Fournier > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed > > > Where can we see the new portal?

Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed

2002-08-22 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 22 August 2002 03:25 > To: Marc G. Fournier > Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed > > The new portal isn't going to he