pro contrib/:
You have four pro arguments, two of which are for marketing and the other two
are for lazyness :-)
pro gborg:
As you note, you will be more independent on gborg, so why not?
Maybe a wish for some official mention of this - and other important - gborg
project in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- allows us to say that PostgreSQL ships with field-tested
replication in the source tree
We have a winner! I think this one trumps all the rest.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200307160920
-BEGIN PGP
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 02:23:21PM +0200, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
pro contrib/:
You have four pro arguments, two of which are for marketing and the
other two are for lazyness :-)
For what it's worth, I don't think the marketing arguments are
nothing. That view was confirmed by what I heard
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:35:38PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
is this code really a replacement for rserv? There has been work on
rserv in contrib that I'm guessing was not used in the commercial
version. are we better off calling this rserv2 or something and letting
both projects stand side
I had a bug in one of my queries that wasn't detected by pg because if
filled in the from clause by itself. Take for example a querie like
select foo.a;
which I guess is transformed to
select foo.a
from foo;
Is this really a good thing to do? Is it part of the standard? Can it be
turned of?
Is this really a good thing to do? Is it part of the standard? Can it be
turned of? In my case it hid a bug and made my query work but produce the
wrong result.
7.4 has a switch to turn this off for the same reasons you cite.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I had a bug in one of my queries that wasn't detected by pg because if
filled in the from clause by itself. Take for example a querie like
select foo.a;
which I guess is transformed to
select foo.a
from foo;
Is this really a good thing to do? Is it part of the standard? Can it
be
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:42:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Patrick Welche [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
What string constant?! Will try again later...
Which flex version are you using? You need 2.5.4 --- the most recent
versions have broken backwards compatibility :-(. I'm not sure what
ivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
why when i revoke all on scheme pg_catalog from all (with public)
i can make select from pg_ tables and views as ordinary user ??
Hm. pg_catalog is forcibly placed into the search path, thus bypassing
the normal check on whether you have USAGE privilege on it. I
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:35:38PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
is this code really a replacement for rserv? There has been work on
rserv in contrib that I'm guessing was not used in the commercial
version. are we better off calling this rserv2 or
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Mendola Gaetano wrote:
Hi all,
we are going to move our production postgres box ( on Linux )
in a new machine, I'm wondering if I shall leave the Hyperthreading
feature on or disable it.
The newer kernels are hyper-threading aware. No idea how much faster that
might
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:03:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Given the current implementation, it seems like there are three possible
behaviors for COMMENT ON DATABASE when the database name isn't the same
as the current database:
There's a fourth
On 16 Jul 2003 at 9:07, scott.marlowe wrote:
PS: Is really faster postgresql compiled with Intel compiler ?
Note that since most people use gcc, any problems caused by the Intel
compiler might take more time to get fixed.
Last I heard was that gcc was pretty neck to neck with intel
Is the patches list working?
I submitted on yesterday that never made it.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 08:29:01 +0200,
Dennis Björklund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a bug in one of my queries that wasn't detected by pg because if
filled in the from clause by itself. Take for example a querie like
Currently this is the only way to use additional tables when doing a
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:58:01PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could you try lex/scan.l 1.13 i just committed?
Yes, that fixed it!
Cheers,
Patrick
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
A few weeks ago I posted a message on this board requesting interest
from anyone who would be willing to participate in a Request For
Proposal (RFP) to provide software development and project management
for Washington State. I am happy to announce that we have several
dozen participants at
Can somebody clarify for me the requirement for the SHMSEG kernel parameter,
please.
The Postgres doc says:
SHMSEG - Maximum number of shared memory segments per process
only 1 segment is needed, but the default is much higher
I was trying to calculate the kernel parameters for running
hi,
what fields in LOCK datastructures can i use to uniquely identify each row of a table? if each row is seperately locked that is.
thanks
jennyAdd photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:57:41PM -0500, Thomas Swan wrote:
Does anyone have recent archives of the pgsql-hackers list in mbx or
flat file format?
I know that I can search through the website or through other
interfaces, but I would like to be able to download a file containing
the
--On Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:31:24 -0400 Alvaro Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:57:41PM -0500, Thomas Swan wrote:
Does anyone have recent archives of the pgsql-hackers list in mbx or
flat file format?
I know that I can search through the website or through other
and how disallow : LISTEN , SET , RESET , and SHOW ?
Explain why we should?
When you want to LISTEN sth pg insert rec into pg_listens (?) or somewhere
there, so why someone could rubish my db ?
In my project i need close everything even most of pg_catalog.
User shoudl exec only special
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is the patches list working?
I saw something come through yesterday from Rod.
I submitted on yesterday that never made it.
Are you subscribed? With Marc out of town this week, anything held for
moderator approval won't see the light of day before
Yes I am subscribed.
I also sent it to you directly seeing as if it was slow.
LER
--On Wednesday, July 16, 2003 17:16:55 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is the patches list working?
I saw something come through yesterday from Rod.
I submitted
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:35:51PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:31:24 -0400 Alvaro Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:57:41PM -0500, Thomas Swan wrote:
Does anyone have recent archives of the pgsql-hackers list in mbx or
flat file
WHen running PostgreSQL 7.3.3-1 (from rpm's) on Redhat 9.0 I got the
following in logs and the postmaster will not start up.
Any Ideas what I could do to start up ?
This in on a laptop used for development, but I still would like to not
initdb.
postmaster successfully started
LOG: database
ivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my project i need close everything even most of pg_catalog.
User shoudl exec only special func. and not more. He know which they are.
It sounds to me like you shouldn't be allowing your users to execute SQL
commands directly at all.
nay be not all, but only select from same function.
Is there sht like umask
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
ivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my project i need close everything even most of pg_catalog.
User shoudl exec only special func. and not more. He know which they are.
It
Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
WHen running PostgreSQL 7.3.3-1 (from rpm's) on Redhat 9.0 I got the
following in logs and the postmaster will not start up.
PANIC: XLogWrite: write request 0/30504000 is past end of log
0/30504000
This looks like you've stumbled across some sort of
29 matches
Mail list logo
