[HACKERS] difference in extract and to_char

2003-10-14 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I just noticed this fairly silly behaviour: test=# select to_char(current_date, 'D'), extract(dow from current_date); to_char | date_part -+--- 3 | 2 (1 row) I guess we can't change that now, but they really should number their days from the same base... Chris

Re: [HACKERS] comments on casts

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it true to say that it's impossible for me to allow comments on casts, as there is no OID on the pg_cast table? Eh? regression=# select oid from pg_cast; oid --- 16420 16421 16422 16423 16424 ... etc ... It would be a very

Re: [HACKERS] comments on casts

2003-10-14 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
regression=# select oid from pg_cast; oid --- 16420 16421 16422 16423 16424 ... etc ... It would be a very serious design error if pg_cast didn't have OIDs, because then pg_cast entries couldn't have dependency entries in pg_depend. OK. Weird. I could have _sworn_ I tried that and I

Re: [HACKERS] Heading to final release

2003-10-14 Thread Rod Taylor
Some dumb-user/fat-finger/ooops protection is surely welcome, but there is a limit. A system console has to be behind a locked door instead of the single-user boot being root-password protected. As soon as people Unfortunately, as more and more companies start to outsource their

Re: [HACKERS] comments on casts

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also, with the pg_largeobject table, there seems to be no 'owner' concept on lobs at all. So is there no problem with any random gumby commenting on anyone else's large object? We don't have a lot of choice. I suppose ideally LOs should

Re: [HACKERS] Heading to final release

2003-10-14 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:51:52PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote: You can build more secure systems as long as you want, evolution will develop the better idiot. As long as you create safer cars with more Sure, but I think all Rod is asking for is something like the ability to add the -w switch to

Re: [HACKERS] CREATE USER bug

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 16:21, Joshua D. Drake wrote: postgres=# create user with encrypted password '98wq7912a'; CREATE USER postgres=# create user with encrypted password '98wq7912a'; ERROR: CREATE USER: user name with already exists So, what are we

Re: [HACKERS] Heading to final release

2003-10-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: What to do about exposing the list of possible SQLSTATE error codes I say we put the list in the documentatio and that's it. Exposing the list in C header files wouldn't really be an ultimate solution, because not everyone uses C. Freeze message strings That is old

Re: [HACKERS] comments on casts

2003-10-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes: Also, with the pg_largeobject table, there seems to be no 'owner' concept on lobs at all. So is there no problem with any random gumby commenting on anyone else's large object? Not any worse that any random gumby reading or writing anyone else's large object.

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Brusser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2003-10-10 22:37:05 ERROR: cannot read block 0 of s_noteimportlinks: Interrupted system call Hmm. I found this hard to believe at first, but indeed my local man pages for read() and write() say they can return EINTR if interrupted by a signal. This

[HACKERS] feature request

2003-10-14 Thread Michael Brusser
I wonder if this is feasible to enhance create trigger so I could say 'create or replace' Thanks, Mike. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

2003-10-14 Thread Michael Brusser
Yes, we use NFS. Many of our customers use it as well. Mike. -Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... ... Michael Brusser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2003-10-10 22:37:05 ERROR: cannot read block 0 of s_noteimportlinks: Interrupted system call Hmm. I

Re: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

2003-10-14 Thread Bob Badour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dann Corbit) wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... -Original Message- From: Seun Osewa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 11:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Hi, This is for

Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Sun performance - Major discovery!

2003-10-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Marko Karppinen writes: GCC sets __FAST_MATH__ even if you counter a -ffast-math with the negating flags above. This means that it is not currently possible to use the -fast flag when compiling PostgreSQL at all. Instead, you have to go through all the flags Apple is setting and only pass on

[HACKERS] Request for Info.

2003-10-14 Thread Srikanth Pentakota
Hi, I am an Oracle DBA having 4 +years of experience and want to migrate to postgreSQL . Please kindly Assist me for Documents to convert Oracle Application to PostgreSQL . And also send me the links to open source code for postgreSQL. Thanks Regards, Srikanth Pentakota

Re: [HACKERS] Separate shared_buffer management process

2003-10-14 Thread sailesh
This would be a good idea I think. DB2 has a page-cleaner background process that periodically writes out dirty pages to disk. Reduces checkpoint I/O. I don't see much point in serializing all bufferpool I/O through a separate dedicated backend. Informix uses something like this. -- Pip-pip

Re: [HACKERS] Parallel postgresql

2003-10-14 Thread Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Bruce Momjian wrote: Martin Rusoff wrote: I was just contemplating how to make postgres parallel (for DSS applications)... Has anyone done work on this? It looks to me like there are a couple of obvious places to add parallel operation: Stage 1) I/O , perhaps through MPIO - would improve

Re: [HACKERS] [PORTS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src/template bsdi freebsd

2003-10-14 Thread Henry B. Hotz
At 10:45 AM -0400 10/9/03, Bruce Momjian wrote: Neil Conway wrote: On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 09:35, Bruce Momjian wrote: I only put back what was already there --- not sure why others don't use it. You want it enabled on Linux? Well, why do we have it enabled at all? If it's to speed

Re: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

2003-10-14 Thread Anith Sen
The mathematics of language is more complex than the mathematics of relations, particularly simple relations (such as 1NF tables). Are you sure, you know what you are talking about? I would suggest ditching the entire relational model (as both overly simplistic in its theory and overly

[HACKERS] Using JDBC and libpq in the same process

2003-10-14 Thread Nicola Pero
Hi, I have to work on some software which is using JDBC and libpq (via JNI) in the same process to connect to the same Postgres database. The software is heavily multithreaded. When running under heavy loads and accessing the database under JDBC and libpq at the same time, we get obscure JVM

Re: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

2003-10-14 Thread Lauri Pietarinen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Seun Osewa) wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have tried, twice, to download the evaluation version of the alphora product for testing and it doesn't work. Guess there would be a lot to learn from playing with it; the product is more than a RDBMS Aw, that's

Re: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

2003-10-14 Thread Bob Badour
With all due respect, Dawn, you are an idiot. Dawn M. Wolthuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Good question. Although I would want to move away from relational databases too, if there is an RDBMS and one wants to query it, what would I aim for? If you look at

Re: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

2003-10-14 Thread Dawn M. Wolthuis
Good question. Although I would want to move away from relational databases too, if there is an RDBMS and one wants to query it, what would I aim for? If you look at XQuery, you will see an example of what I would definitely NOT aim for. Although the user of such a language might very well be a

Re: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

2003-10-14 Thread Seun Osewa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dawn M. Wolthuis) wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I would suggest ditching the entire relational model (as both overly simplistic in its theory and overly complex in its implementation) and start with English (that is one of the other names for the GIRLS

Re: [HACKERS] [JDBC] Using JDBC and libpq in the same process

2003-10-14 Thread Dave Cramer
Nicola, No, the driver does not use libpq it uses it's own socket code. Dave On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 07:30, Nicola Pero wrote: Hi, I have to work on some software which is using JDBC and libpq (via JNI) in the same process to connect to the same Postgres database. The software is heavily

Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit

2003-10-14 Thread Hans-Jürgen Schönig
I'm tired of this kind of 2PC is too slow arguments. I think Satoshi, the only guy who made a trial implementation of 2PC for PostgreSQL, has already showed that 2PC is not that slow. Where does Satoshi's implementation sit right now? Will it patch to v7.4? Can it provide us with a base to work

Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit

2003-10-14 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: Agreed. Let's get it into 7.5 and see it in action. If we need to adjust it, we can, but right now, we need something for distributed transactions, and this seems like the logical direction. I've started working on two-phase commits last week, and

Re: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

2003-10-14 Thread Bob Badour
Mike Preece [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dawn M. Wolthuis) wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Bob Badour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dawn M. Wolthuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL

Re: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

2003-10-14 Thread Mike Preece
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dawn M. Wolthuis) wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Bob Badour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dawn M. Wolthuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you, Seun, for asking your question with a bit of logic

Re: [HACKERS] Hacking PostgreSQL to work in Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther 7B85)

2003-10-14 Thread James Wilson
Hi Marko, I've done a checkout from CVS and performed a build under OS X Panther 7B85 with the non-hacked header files. The problem with the param.h header file seems to be fixed, however the build is failing with undefined symbols in libs: make -C ecpglib all gcc -no-cpp-precomp -g -O2 -Wall

[HACKERS] [Linus Torvalds torvalds@osdl.org] Re: statfs() / statvfs() syscall ballsup...

2003-10-14 Thread Greg Stark
There's an interesting thread on linux-kernel right now about O_DIRECT and the kernel i/o APIs databases need. I noticed a connection between what they were discussing and the earlier discussions here and the pining for an interface to avoid having vacuum preempt other disk i/o. Someone from

Re: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

2003-10-14 Thread Dawn M. Wolthuis
Thank you, Seun, for asking your question with a bit of logic and not gut-reaction emotional baggage (and for also asking a question of me off-list so I could ramble). I'll try to make this more suscinct. First of all, I have read Codd's 1970 1974 ACM papers, as well as his The Relational Model

Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit

2003-10-14 Thread Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Why would you spent time on implementing a mechanism whose ultimate benefit is supposed to be increasing reliability and performance, when you already realize that it will have to lock up at the slightest sight of trouble? There are better mechanisms out there that you can use instead. If you

Re: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

2003-10-14 Thread Dawn M. Wolthuis
Bob Badour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dawn M. Wolthuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you, Seun, for asking your question with a bit of logic and not gut-reaction emotional baggage (and for also asking a question of me

Re: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

2003-10-14 Thread Bob Badour
Dawn M. Wolthuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you, Seun, for asking your question with a bit of logic and not gut-reaction emotional baggage (and for also asking a question of me off-list so I could ramble). I'll try to make this more suscinct. With all due

Re: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL

2003-10-14 Thread Dawn M. Wolthuis
While I definitely agree that the mathematics of the data persistence mechanism is not as important to me as whether it works or not, as a former mathematician, I have done a little study related to the mathematics of non-relational approaches, such as PICK (the one both Wol and I have been know

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Brusser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, we use NFS. Many of our customers use it as well. You are of course aware that this is not real safe... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and

Re: [HACKERS] Parallel postgresql

2003-10-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Martin Rusoff wrote: I was just contemplating how to make postgres parallel (for DSS applications)... Has anyone done work on this? It looks to me like there are a couple of obvious places to add parallel operation: Stage 1) I/O ,

[HACKERS] Stupid index idea...

2003-10-14 Thread Mario Weilguni
Hi, probably it's just a stupid idea, but what do you think of this:currently, most if not all queries with aggregates (count(), sum()) make seq scans when there are no conditions at all. especially count() is a classic question on any postgres list. the reason is - at least that's what I

[HACKERS] create database that already exists.

2003-10-14 Thread Merlin Moncure
Here is a verbatim readout of my typing commands into the database shell. I issued a 'create database' to pg 7.4b2 and it did not fail despite an already existing database with the same name. Just thought I'd pass it along, I haven't been able to reproduce it. Just thought I'd pass it along...

Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Sun performance - Major discovery!

2003-10-14 Thread Marko Karppinen
On 14.10.2003, at 19:52, Tom Lane wrote: This means that relaxing the check would require (a) finding out which of the sub-flags break our code and which don't; (b) finding out how the answer to (a) has varied with gcc release; and (c) finding out how we can test whether a given sub-flag is set

Re: [HACKERS] Hacking PostgreSQL to work in Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther 7B85)

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
James Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: make -C ecpglib all gcc -no-cpp-precomp -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -bundle execute.o typename.o descriptor.o data.o error.o prepare.o memory.o connect.o misc.o -L../../../../src/port -L/opt/local/lib -L../pgtypeslib

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

2003-10-14 Thread Greg Stark
Michael Brusser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Michael Brusser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2003-10-10 22:37:05 ERROR: cannot read block 0 of s_noteimportlinks: Interrupted system call Hmm. I found this hard to believe at first, but indeed my local man pages for read() and write() say

Re: [HACKERS] create database that already exists.

2003-10-14 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 01:58:24PM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote: Here is a verbatim readout of my typing commands into the database shell. I issued a 'create database' to pg 7.4b2 and it did not fail despite an already existing database with the same name. Just thought I'd pass it along, I

Re: [HACKERS] create database that already exists.

2003-10-14 Thread Merlin Moncure
Alvaro Herrera wrote: So, how did you know the database already existed? The objects you are seeing may be well part of template1 ... You are right, I'm an idiot...sorry :) Merlin ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 11:34:14AM -0400, Fernando Nasser wrote: Unrelated question, And we developed a very nice tool that depends on this feature confident that we could count on it. Is this tool going to be released somehow? -- Alvaro Herrera (alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl) I dream about

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 11:34:14AM -0400, Fernando Nasser wrote: And we developed a very nice tool that depends on this feature confident that we could count on it. Is this tool going to be released somehow? Certainly. Keep an eye on

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Fernando Nasser wrote: Bruce, Before I comment on your suggestions, I would like to mention that many of the things below were added on request by the few people who cared to comment on it. Aizaz spent most of his time changing here and there to accommodate these requests. Anyway, we

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

2003-10-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Michael Brusser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, we use NFS. Many of our customers use it as well. You are of course aware that this is not real safe... Maybe we should throw a stop using NFS if we get an EINTR from read()/write(), or explain what NFS options they should

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

2003-10-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, October 14, 2003 15:31:42 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Michael Brusser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, we use NFS. Many of our customers use it as well. You are of course aware that this is not real safe... Maybe we should throw a stop using NFS if

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

2003-10-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Larry Rosenman wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. --On Tuesday, October 14, 2003 15:31:42 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Michael Brusser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, we use NFS. Many of our customers use it as well. You are of course aware

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

2003-10-14 Thread scott.marlowe
On 14 Oct 2003, Greg Stark wrote: Michael Brusser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Michael Brusser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2003-10-10 22:37:05 ERROR: cannot read block 0 of s_noteimportlinks: Interrupted system call Hmm. I found this hard to believe at first, but indeed my

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Jon Jensen
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: I knew you were adding --help-config, but I didn't realize the extent of the features. The commit message is: revision 1.1 date: 2003/07/04 16:41:21; author: tgl; state: Exp; Add --help-config facility to dump information about

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Alvaro Herrera Munoz
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 07:52:55PM +, Jon Jensen wrote: Is there a mailing list somewhere that all the CVS commits get sent to? Yes, pgsql-committers. Other projects I've worked on have such a list, and each commit message is followed by a complete diff (usually with -u for

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Jon Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 October 2003 20:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config Is there a mailing list somewhere that all the CVS commits get sent to? Other projects I've worked on have such a

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

2003-10-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
wscott.marlowe wrote: If you use intr then this type of thing can happen. Lots of programs assume the unix semantics for disk accesses. You can get all kinds of bugs when they're violated. If you use soft then the consequences can be much much worse. If your fileserver were to reboot

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Neil Conway
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 15:57, Alvaro Herrera Munoz wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 07:52:55PM +, Jon Jensen wrote: Other projects I've worked on have such a list, and each commit message is followed by a complete diff (usually with -u for readability) so even non-committers can do a code

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Rod Taylor
I wouldn't want the whole diff on the mail, but a link to the relevant diffs in cvsweb would be most useful (one for each changed file -- not ideal, but much better than nothing). You're not the first one to suggest it ... I agree, it would be very useful. Marc, would it be possible to

Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Sun performance - Major discovery!

2003-10-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Marko Karppinen writes: I'm not aware of any Darwin-specific workarounds in the tree right now; the only thing close to that is the support for Apple's two-level namespaces feature. And while you can argue the relative merits of Apple's approach, the reason for its existence isn't sloppiness

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Jon Jensen
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Rod Taylor wrote: I wouldn't want the whole diff on the mail, but a link to the relevant diffs in cvsweb would be most useful (one for each changed file -- not ideal, but much better than nothing). You're not the first one to suggest it ... I agree, it would be

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: Let me be clear on this --- your tools is not part of the PostgreSQL community. We are not required to allow any of this functionality unless the community decides they want it. The major argument for keeping it, in my mind, is to be helpful to Red Hat. My current

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: Let me be clear on this --- your tools is not part of the PostgreSQL community. We are not required to allow any of this functionality unless the community decides they want it. The major argument for keeping it, in my mind, is to be

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Peter Eisentraut wrote: I'm beginning to think that we should scrap it and start with a real design for 7.5. I know that's radical, but I don't think we're going to arrive at anything that anyone's going to like by the time we want to release. The

[HACKERS] pg_dump oid representation

2003-10-14 Thread Manuel Sugawara
I did the es translation of pg_dump and while looking at the code I found that in several places the char * representation of Oid's is used instead of the oid itself. Any one knows why is done this way? Regards, Manuel. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Peter Eisentraut wrote: I'm beginning to think that we should scrap it and start with a real design for 7.5. I know that's radical, but I don't think we're going to arrive at anything that anyone's going to like by the time we want

Re: [HACKERS] Stupid index idea...

2003-10-14 Thread Jan Wieck
There is no backward link from a heap tuple to it's index entries. So if you have 3 indexes on a table and do an update, you need at least 2 more index lookups just to set that bit, if you somehow manage to remember by what index you found this heap tuple in the first place. On update-heavy

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Request for Info.

2003-10-14 Thread Josh Berkus
Srikanth, HACKERS and DOCS are not the appropriate mailing lists for your request. If you need follow-up help, please join NOVICE or GENERAL. I am an Oracle DBA having 4 +years of experience and want to migrate to postgreSQL . Please kindly Assist me for Documents to convert Oracle

Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Sun performance - Major discovery!

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
Marko Karppinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At least the --fast-math part causes problems, seeing that PostgreSQL actually checks for the __FAST_MATH__ macro to make sure that it isn't turned on. There might be other problems with Apple's flags, but I think that the __FAST_MATH__ check should

Re: [HACKERS] Database Kernels and O_DIRECT

2003-10-14 Thread Greg Stark
James Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Someone from Oracle is on there explaining what Oracle's needs are. Perhaps someone more knowledgable than myself could explain what would most help postgres in this area. There is an important difference between Oracle and Postgres that makes

Re: [HACKERS] postgres --help-config

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... Will Red Hat be upset if we leave it unchanged for 7.4.X and rip this out and redo it in 7.5? It'd be better if we could get it right the first time, with the understanding that the output format is not very negotiable at this late hour. But as best

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump oid representation

2003-10-14 Thread Tom Lane
Manuel Sugawara [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I did the es translation of pg_dump and while looking at the code I found that in several places the char * representation of Oid's is used instead of the oid itself. Any one knows why is done this way? AFAIR pg_dump invariably stores OIDs as strings