I'm rewriting the patch so don't worry :-)
Thanks,
Gavin
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
I don't know if this provides any more info than you already have -
but is my last few lines from a single process backend run with valgrind :
==19666== Syscall param write(buf) contains
What's the safest email browser?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list
I don't know if this provides any more info than you already have -
but is my last few lines from a single process backend run with valgrind :
==19666== Syscall param write(buf) contains uninitialised or
unaddressable byte(s)
==19666==at 0x404D94F8: __GI___libc_write (in /lib/libc-2.3.2.so)
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 22:47, Santo Quartarone wrote:
What's the safest email browser?
telnet mailserver.domain.tld 110
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail
Hi,
Since I'm waiting for someone to comment on my last question about dump
ordering for grant and owner statements, what I think I'll do is submit
a patch first (to get in before feature freeze) that adds all the OWNER
TO commands, docs and regression tests. It will also do RENAME and
OWNER
PostgreSQL currently uses $1/$2 for placeholders in prepared statements.
I'm writing something that may potentially submit queries to both Oracle
and Postgres, and it seems Oracle doesn't accept this syntax. Someone on
IRC said I could use ? for both Oracle and Postgres. It isn't entirely
clear to
Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should Postgres accept ? as a placeholder?
We think it's an operator character:
regression=# select 1 ? 4;
ERROR: operator does not exist: integer ? integer
I count eighteen standard operators that would be broken if we changed
'?' to mean a
Dave Page wrote:
OK, looks like the error below is a Win32 thing. The patch attached
#ifdef'd out the permissions check on the private key file as it won't
work under Windows anyway (a similar check in postmaster.c has has
already been ifdef'd out for the same reason).
Incidently, the
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should Postgres accept ? as a placeholder?
In short, I think this notation sucks and I don't want to emulate it.
Certainly it sucks. Unfortunately it's the supported ODBC API which is
emulated by everyone else,
Greg Stark wrote:
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should Postgres accept ? as a placeholder?
In short, I think this notation sucks and I don't want to emulate it.
Certainly it sucks. Unfortunately it's the supported ODBC API which is
emulated by
Personally, I agree. The '?' sucks for multiple reasons. The major reason
being when you want to use the same parameter in more than one place in a
statement. Another reason is query rewrites where you have to reorganize the
actual order of parameters. You are then forced to first convert the '?'
Does anyone have any new ways to create clusters without using initdb
or bootstrap mode? I need to be able to create one without those 2
things. Any ideas?
thanks!
Alex
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 09:16:35PM -0400, Alexander Cohen wrote:
Does anyone have any new ways to create clusters without using initdb
or bootstrap mode? I need to be able to create one without those 2
things. Any ideas?
initdb'ing somewhere else and copying the resulting directory?
--
Alexander Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone have any new ways to create clusters without using initdb
or bootstrap mode? I need to be able to create one without those 2
things. Any ideas?
Perhaps you should explain *why* you think you need this?
regards,
14 matches
Mail list logo
