On Sat, 2005-17-09 at 14:47 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Also, the change to pg_cancel_backend breaks backwards compatibility
> with 8.0, which is a whole lot worse than breaking it with 8.1-beta1.
Yeah, I thought about that (and Bruce and I already discussed it offlist
before I committed the c
> >>Having spent days, no, weeks deciding on that name on list I do not
> >>want to see it change this late, especially as we'll now need to go
> >>and update pgAdmin again!
>
> Fortunately, pgAdmin doesn't use that function, but only the
> basic pg_relation_size(). Phew!
Good for you :-)
>
Magnus Hagander wrote:
I thought we'd more or less dropped that idea based on Andreas'
responses.
I've heard no argument against renaming
pg_complete_relation_size() to
pg_total_relation_size()
Having spent days, no, weeks deciding on that name on list I
do not want to see it change thi
Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to write a C trigger. Essentially
> TriggerData *in = (TriggerData *) fcinfo->context;
> HeapTupleHeader tuple=in->tg_trigtuple->t_data;
> Datum datum;
> datum = GetAttributeByName(tuple, "unit_id", &isnull);
> and that l
I am trying to write a C trigger. Essentially
TriggerData *in = (TriggerData *) fcinfo->context;
HeapTupleHeader tuple=in->tg_trigtuple->t_data;
Datum datum;
datum = GetAttributeByName(tuple, "unit_id", &isnull);
and that last line fails with
ERROR: cache lookup failed for t
> > > I thought we'd more or less dropped that idea based on Andreas'
> > > responses.
> >
> > I've heard no argument against renaming
> pg_complete_relation_size() to
> > pg_total_relation_size()
>
> Having spent days, no, weeks deciding on that name on list I
> do not want to see it change th
> It occurs to me that there is no longer any great need to
> have a separate hackers list for win32 development. Perhaps
> we should close it down now and keep all development on -hackers?
I also think this is a good idea. The number of "win32 only issues of
-hacker level" is significantly smal
""Dave Page"" writes
> It occurs to me that there is no longer any great need to have a
> separate hackers list for win32 development. Perhaps we should close it
> down now and keep all development on -hackers?
I agree with it.
> Regards, Dave.
>
> ---(end of broadcast)-
Title: Corrupt catalog
In trying to determine why I had a corrupted piece of data (still investigating that) I created a temporary table that contained the row of data in question. In doing so, I must have done something to the pg_catalog because I no longer was able to perform a dump withou
