Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Andrej Ricnik-Bay
> don't feel upset, that time I already learned how to control missile :) Just curious ... how old does one need to be to be allowed that? :) I was of "legal drinking age" then, btw .. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the plann

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote: Anyone able to beat that? Sorry, I was still in Junior High in '82 :( Man, you are *old* :) At Marc hands himself a foot gun... I was 9 years old in 82. damn, now *I* feel old :) don't feel u

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote: Anyone able to beat that? Sorry, I was still in Junior High in '82 :( Man, you are *old* :) At Marc hands himself a foot gun... I was 9 years old in 82. damn, now *I* feel old :) Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Jonah H. Harris
/me was 1 year old in 1982On 2/17/06, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Anyone able to beat that?>> Sorry, I was still in Junior High in '82 :(  Man, you are *old* :)>And Marc hands himself a foot gun... I was 9 years old in 82. Joshua D. Drake>> > Marc G. Fournier   Hub

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Anyone able to beat that? Sorry, I was still in Junior High in '82 :( Man, you are *old* :) At Marc hands himself a foot gun... I was 9 years old in 82. Joshua D. Drake Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Anyone able to beat that? Sorry, I was still in Junior High in '82 :( Man, you are *old* :) And Marc hands himself a foot gun... I was 9 years old in 82. Joshua D. Drake Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Michael Fuhr wrote: On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 09:35:32PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Sorry, I was still in Junior High in '82 :( Man, you are *old* :) Anybody know some reasonable postgresql.conf settings for a system that starts up with Cass? Memory Size? 'cuz I st

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Christopher Browne
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) would write: > I said: >> The oldest thing I can actually document at the moment > > After further digging, I found something older: conclusive proof that > I was present at the invention of the smiley. I've been heard to asser

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 09:35:32PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Sorry, I was still in Junior High in '82 :( Man, you are *old* :) Anybody know some reasonable postgresql.conf settings for a system that starts up with Cass? Memory Size? 'cuz I still have one :-) -- Michael Fuhr --

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Tom Lane wrote: I said: The oldest thing I can actually document at the moment After further digging, I found something older: conclusive proof that I was present at the invention of the smiley. I've been heard to assert that before, but apparently someone has actually m

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Tom Lane
I said: > The oldest thing I can actually document at the moment After further digging, I found something older: conclusive proof that I was present at the invention of the smiley. I've been heard to assert that before, but apparently someone has actually managed to unearth archives that had bee

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Bruce Momjian writes: >>> My first post to Usenet was May 1991: >> >> Newbie ;-) > OK, don't taunt us. What date do you have? :-) Not sure, but I remember being netnews admin for CMU in '87. (Grad student slave labor position, mind you, not prestigi

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote: Joshua D. Drake wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: I have updated my email signature because I think it is no longer necessary to list contact information now that my home page has all that information. (At the time I created it, email was becoming popular b

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > My first post to Usenet was May 1991: > > Newbie ;-) OK, don't taunt us. What date do you have? :-) -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > My first post to Usenet was May 1991: Newbie ;-) regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/ What! Can't you embed an image in there too! :-) You

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I have updated my email signature because I think it is no longer > > necessary to list contact information now that my home page has all that > > information. (At the time I created it, email was becoming popular but > > personal web sites were ra

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create

2006-02-17 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On 2/17/06, Ragnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Say again ? > Let us say you have 1 billion rows, where the > column in question contains strings like > baaaaaa > baaaaab > baaaaac > ... > not necessarily in this order on disc of course > > The minimu

Re: [HACKERS] who is pgsql in cvs

2006-02-17 Thread Tom Lane
Christian Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm a grad student doing some work correlating mailinglist activity > with cvs activity for a datamining conference and I'm using postgres > as one of the OSS projects under study. For most names of cvs > committers, I've been able to determine what e-m

Re: [HACKERS] who is pgsql in cvs

2006-02-17 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Christian Bird wrote: Hello, I'm a grad student doing some work correlating mailinglist activity with cvs activity for a datamining conference and I'm using postgres as one of the OSS projects under study. For most names of cvs committers, I've been able to determine what

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create Index

2006-02-17 Thread Tom Lane
Mark Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think we're actually on the same page here; you're right that the > constraint above ( f(a)==f(b) iff a==b ) can't be extended to data types > with more than 32 bits of value space. But the constraint I listed was > actually: > if a==b then f(a)==f(b) I

[HACKERS] who is pgsql in cvs

2006-02-17 Thread Christian Bird
Hello, I'm a grad student doing some work correlating mailinglist activity with cvs activity for a datamining conference and I'm using postgres as one of the OSS projects under study. For most names of cvs committers, I've been able to determine what e-mail addresses they used on this mailinglist

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create

2006-02-17 Thread Ragnar
On fös, 2006-02-17 at 08:01 -0500, Ron wrote: > At 04:24 AM 2/17/2006, Ragnar wrote: > >On fös, 2006-02-17 at 01:20 -0500, Ron wrote: > > > > > > OK, so here's _a_ way (there are others) to obtain a mapping such that > > > if a < b then f(a) < f (b) and > > > if a == b then f(a) == f(b) > > > >

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create Index

2006-02-17 Thread Mark Lewis
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 21:33 -0800, David Lang wrote: > > In SQL_ASCII, just take the first 4 characters (or 8, if using a 64-bit > > sortKey as elsewhere suggested). The sorting key doesn't need to be a > > one-to-one mapping. > > that would violate your second contraint ( f(a)==f(b) iff (a==b) )

Re: [HACKERS] Need pointers to "standard" pg database(s) for testing

2006-02-17 Thread Michael Paesold
Ron wrote: I assume we have such? You could look at the Sample Databases project on pgfoundry: http://pgfoundry.org/projects/dbsamples/ Best Regards, Michael Paesold ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore

Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Need pointers to "standard" pg database(s) for

2006-02-17 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 10:51, Ron wrote: > I assume we have such? Depends on what you wanna do. For transactional systems, look at some of the stuff OSDL has done. For large geospatial type stuff, the government is a good source, like www.usgs.gov or the fcc transmitter database. There are other

[HACKERS] Need pointers to "standard" pg database(s) for testing

2006-02-17 Thread Ron
I assume we have such? Ron ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create

2006-02-17 Thread Ron
At 10:53 AM 2/17/2006, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:23:40AM -0500, Ron wrote: > >For this mapping, you need a full table sort. > One physical IO pass should be all that's needed. However, let's > pretend you are correct and that we do need to sort the table to get > t

Re: [HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Bruce Momjian wrote: I have updated my email signature because I think it is no longer necessary to list contact information now that my home page has all that information. (At the time I created it, email was becoming popular but personal web sites were rare.) Also, I wanted to mention that I

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create Index

2006-02-17 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:18:41AM -0800, Scott Lamb wrote: > On Feb 16, 2006, at 2:17 PM, Mark Lewis wrote: > >Data types which could probably provide a useful function for f > >would be > >int2, int4, oid, and possibly int8 and text (at least for SQL_ASCII). > > ...and with some work, floats (

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create Index

2006-02-17 Thread Scott Lamb
On Feb 16, 2006, at 2:17 PM, Mark Lewis wrote:Data types which could probably provide a useful function for f would be int2, int4, oid, and possibly int8 and text (at least for SQL_ASCII). ...and with some work, floats (I think just the exponent would work, if nothing else). bytea. Probably just ab

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create

2006-02-17 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:23:40AM -0500, Ron wrote: > >For this mapping, you need a full table sort. > One physical IO pass should be all that's needed. However, let's > pretend you are correct and that we do need to sort the table to get > the key mapping. Even so, we would only need to do it

[HACKERS] Updated email signature

2006-02-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have updated my email signature because I think it is no longer necessary to list contact information now that my home page has all that information. (At the time I created it, email was becoming popular but personal web sites were rare.) Also, I wanted to mention that I work for SRA OSS more p

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create

2006-02-17 Thread Ron
At 05:19 AM 2/17/2006, Markus Schaber wrote: Hi, Ron, Ron schrieb: > OK, so here's _a_ way (there are others) to obtain a mapping such that > if a < b then f(a) < f (b) and > if a == b then f(a) == f(b) > > Pretend each row is a integer of row size (so a 2KB row becomes a 16Kb > integer; a 4K

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create

2006-02-17 Thread Ron
At 04:24 AM 2/17/2006, Ragnar wrote: On fös, 2006-02-17 at 01:20 -0500, Ron wrote: > > OK, so here's _a_ way (there are others) to obtain a mapping such that > if a < b then f(a) < f (b) and > if a == b then f(a) == f(b) > By scanning the table once, we can map say 001h (Hex used to ease

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create

2006-02-17 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Ron, Ron schrieb: > OK, so here's _a_ way (there are others) to obtain a mapping such that > if a < b then f(a) < f (b) and > if a == b then f(a) == f(b) > > Pretend each row is a integer of row size (so a 2KB row becomes a 16Kb > integer; a 4KB row becomes a 32Kb integer; etc) > Since eve

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create Index

2006-02-17 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, David, David Lang schrieb: >> In SQL_ASCII, just take the first 4 characters (or 8, if using a 64-bit >> sortKey as elsewhere suggested). The sorting key doesn't need to be a >> one-to-one mapping. > that would violate your second contraint ( f(a)==f(b) iff (a==b) ) no, it doesn't. When b

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create Index

2006-02-17 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 09:18:39AM +0100, Jens-Wolfhard Schicke wrote: > What I think as the biggest problem is the digit representation necessary > for Radix-Sort in cases of locales which sort without looking at spaces. I > assume that would be hard to implement. The same goes for the proposed

Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create Index

2006-02-17 Thread Jens-Wolfhard Schicke
--On Donnerstag, Februar 16, 2006 10:39:45 -0800 Dann Corbit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: He refers to counting sort and radix sort (which comes in most significant digit and least significant digit format). These are also called distribution (as opposed to comparison) sorts. These sorts are O(