Ühel kenal päeval, R, 2006-05-05 kell 17:51, kirjutas Jim C. Nasby:
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 12:09:45AM +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
??hel kenal p??eval, N, 2006-05-04 kell 17:23, kirjutas Jim Nasby:
I often find myself wanting to know how many transactions per second
a database is
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:26:33PM -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
Just to update everyone, I've refactored a good amount of the
rebuild-control-values-from-WAL code and should have it ready for
-patches tomorrow.
I've not seen any patch for this come past...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van
The first item on the todo list is remove behaviour
of postmaster -o. Does that simply mean remove the
option and the associated processing from
postmaster.c?
Is anyone working on this?
I've attached a naive patch that does what I've
described above. It compiles and passes the test
script in
Andy Chambers wrote:
The first item on the todo list is remove behaviour
of postmaster -o. Does that simply mean remove the
option and the associated processing from
postmaster.c?
Is anyone working on this?
I've attached a naive patch that does what I've
described above. It compiles
Andy Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The first item on the todo list is remove behaviour
of postmaster -o. Does that simply mean remove the
option and the associated processing from
postmaster.c?
No, it means something closer to this:
David Fetter wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:02:02PM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Why can PLs not handle pseudo-types?
No one's done the work to figure out which ones are sensible to
support and then add the logic needed to support them.
PL/Java
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 05:26:31PM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
I find very little information about how to write functions that deals
with arrays. My only source of information right now is the
arrayutils.c. Other pointers to docs and code are greatly appreciated.
Looking at
Thomas Hallgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The thing that makes me a bit confused is the
ArrayMetaState. The functions obtain it using:
my_extra = (ArrayMetaState *) fcinfo-flinfo-fn_extra;
which is fine if there's only one array parameter. What happens if I
have two?
Make a struct
On 5/6/06, Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org wrote:
I've not seen any patch for this come past...
Yes, I got a little busy. I ended up refactoring a good amount of the
code because the entire thing is a little ugly. I'll go ahead and
just fix the Coverity stuff first and send the
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 5/6/06, Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org wrote:
I've not seen any patch for this come past...
Yes, I got a little busy. I ended up refactoring a good amount of the
code because the entire thing is a little ugly. I'll go ahead and
just fix the Coverity
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 02:47:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
If you like I can split it into two patches, one patch splits the openssl
stuff out of the main files and a second which adds gnutls
Tom Lane wrote:
Make a struct that can hold two ArrayMetaStates. Or whatever else you
need. What a C function keeps in fn_extra is its own affair.
Yes, of course. I see that now. I was unaware that a function had an
associated user data. What's the semantics associated with the
fn_extra?
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Looking at contrib/intarray/_int_op.c might help. It does something
like this:
ArrayType *a = (ArrayType *)
DatumGetPointer(PG_DETOAST_DATUM_COPY(PG_GETARG_DATUM(0)));
The file src/include/utils/array.h also seems to have many useful
functions.
Hope
I can confirm that this is a bug. The attached SQL shows that creating
a CAST _to_ a domain type doesn't work, though the cast can be created.
The attached SQL provided by Fabien shows the failure.
The error is coming from parse_expr.c::typecast_expression, and its call
to typenameTypeId(). I
Thomas Hallgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, of course. I see that now. I was unaware that a function had an
associated user data. What's the semantics associated with the
fn_extra? Does it retain its setting throughout a session (i.e. the
lifetime of the backend process)?
No, just for
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
The error is coming from parse_expr.c::typecast_expression, and its call
to typenameTypeId(). I wish I understood how we do domains better to
fix this properly. Anyone?
The reason the cast isn't found is that find_coercion_pathway() strips
off the
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 12:16:16AM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Yes, the intarray stuff was very helpful but also somewhat confusing.
Why are there two ways of representing some of the array types? I mean,
why is there an _int4 when you could just as well write int4[]? I'm
probably missing
James William Pye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 12:16:16AM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Why are there two ways of representing some of the array types? I mean,
why is there an _int4 when you could just as well write int4[]? I'm
probably missing the point altogether.
18 matches
Mail list logo
