Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Answering myself here: the filesize for the frontend only part is
about 2k on this system.
Long meeting, time for coding.. :-) Here's a rough patch. Is this about
what you had in mind?
Hm, this seems to make the namespace
On Sunday 12 April 2009 04:10:07 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
So it turns out that for the string above it doesn't make any sense to
have the %d being exactly 1: the code is
So ntups is either 0, or it's greater than 1 -- the first message does
not really make sense to me ...
I'm not really seeing
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
I don't think there is much you can do here. Either leave it out, or write
CANNOT HAPPEN, or just translate normally.
But Alvaro's complaint that the current coding is incorrect for English
still stands, no? Or does ngettext choose the second string
Andrew,
Do we have a final version of this patch yet? I have to do an upgrade
test run today, so it would be a good time to test it.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On Sunday 12 April 2009 18:06:48 Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
I don't think there is much you can do here. Either leave it out, or
write CANNOT HAPPEN, or just translate normally.
But Alvaro's complaint that the current coding is incorrect for English
still
Hi,
Reacting somewhat late, but maybe not too late?
Le 11 avr. 09 à 17:13, Tom Lane a écrit :
My own take on it is that actually I'd prefer one command for all of
these. If I say \df sum it would be good if the output included the
sum() aggregates; the reason being that I might be wondering
Josh Berkus wrote:
Andrew,
Do we have a final version of this patch yet? I have to do an upgrade
test run today, so it would be a good time to test it.
I'm working on an updated patch right now. But it is only cosmetically
different from the one I posted before. Functionally it's
Andrew, Tom,
I just did a test run using Andrew's patch with a database with over 400
objects. I didn't see any locks waiting during the entire run. So the
patch logic appears to work.
Note that it also shows up that some CONSTRAINT declarations really
shouldn't require an exclusive lock.
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@toroid.org
Thanks to Andrew Gierth for writing the function used in the test.
---
src/test/regress/expected/defs.out | 43
src/test/regress/parallel_schedule |2 +-
src/test/regress/serial_schedule |1 +
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Guillaume Smet
guillaume.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
One idea to solve this problem is to tell pg_standby as a
command-line argument about whether the trigger file can be
removed. That
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Fujii-san,
I like the new patch using the content of the file to determine the
mode. Much easier to use at failover time.
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 12:47 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
One problem with this patch is
11 matches
Mail list logo
