2009/7/3 Robert Haas :
> The application stamps comments with the
> community login of the person who left them, but the import stamped
> them with names instead. This is actually of some significance, since
> the app will allow you to edit your own comments but not those of
> other people. We co
2009/7/4 Greg Stark :
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
>> It's pretty hard to guess where your bug is sitting here with no code
>> and no idea even what you've done to trigger it.
>>
see attachment - sorry, comments are czech
>> At a guess there someplace you haven't detoasted
Joe Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> >>> Consistency here is pointless. IIRC the dual method is used in contrib
> >>> because people did not trust the PGXS stuff enough to rip the original
> >>> Make code out; or maybe because people did not w
On Jul 4, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
wrote:
Le 5 juil. 09 à 00:13, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
On Saturday 04 July 2009 01:19:23 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Not arguing one way or the other, a button says, "I am about to
perform
X". A link *always* says, "I am about to go to a new web p
Le 5 juil. 09 à 00:13, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
On Saturday 04 July 2009 01:19:23 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Not arguing one way or the other, a button says, "I am about to
perform
X". A link *always* says, "I am about to go to a new web page".
That was my feeling.
And bots (google etc) will
On Saturday 04 July 2009 01:19:23 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 17:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I guess I'm not really seeing why that particular thing should be a
> > button rather than a link. It would mess up the formatting for no
> > obvious benefit.
>
> Not arguing one wa
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
> It's pretty hard to guess where your bug is sitting here with no code
> and no idea even what you've done to trigger it.
>
> At a guess there someplace you haven't detoasted a datum that had to
> be detoasted. But like I said that's just a guess.
It's pretty hard to guess where your bug is sitting here with no code
and no idea even what you've done to trigger it.
At a guess there someplace you haven't detoasted a datum that had to
be detoasted. But like I said that's just a guess.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@pos
Hello,
I can't to find reason of my problem. I have a varlena type. This type
works well with plain storage, but this raise some random exception
with extended storage. It finish on Assert((data - start) ==
data_size)[heaptuple.c]; I checked - when I return varlena from in
function, then it has co
Hi,
Tom Lane írta:
> Boszormenyi Zoltan writes:
>
>> in a continued effort for better Informix ESQL/C compatibility,
>> we added the "string" pseudo-type handling to ECPG.
>> ...
>> - "string" has become a type name, reserved word in ECPG.
>>
>
> This seems like a sufficient reason to rej
Boszormenyi Zoltan writes:
> in a continued effort for better Informix ESQL/C compatibility,
> we added the "string" pseudo-type handling to ECPG.
> ...
> - "string" has become a type name, reserved word in ECPG.
This seems like a sufficient reason to reject the patch. Who knows
what that will b
Hi,
in a continued effort for better Informix ESQL/C compatibility,
we added the "string" pseudo-type handling to ECPG.
This type in ESQL/C is documented as:
--
The string Data Type
The string data type is an ESQL/C data type that holds character d
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> The main reason contrib still has the alternate method is that PGXS
> doesn't really work until after you've installed the core build.
> For modules distributed separately from core, it doesn't seem that
> exciting to be able to build using the cont
On Jul 3, 2009, at 11:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas writes:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Kevin Grittner" writes:
It seems to be inconsistent. Probably because everything wound up
with the same date, the order is probably more-or-less random.
Yeah, I think that's
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 13:38 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thursday 02 July 2009 12:40:49 Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 11:19 -0400, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> > > A couple of times I've been told "you don't need tinyint, use boolean"
> > > which is not true, several projects I've work
15 matches
Mail list logo
