On May18, 2012, at 23:18 , Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Florian Pflug's message of jue may 17 09:08:26 -0400 2012:
On May16, 2012, at 15:51 , Tom Lane wrote:
It is by design, in that the only contemplated case was truncated-away
pages. I'm pretty hesitant to consider allowing
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Do we have a full list of externally defined open standards that we follow?
Are there any known incompatibilities from externally defined open standards?
(I know about the SQL standard stuff).
The documentation is
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 13 May 2012 18:07, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that pgbench should it make it easy to assess the impact of
foreign key constraints.
I agree in principle. I favour being more inclusive about
I found this in contrib/sepgsql/expected/label.out:
SECURITY LABEL ON COLUMN t2
IS 'system_u:object_r:sepgsql_ro_table_t:s0'; -- be failed
ERROR: improper relation name (too many dotted names): nothing
Contrast with:
SECURITY LABEL ON COLUMN t2.b
IS
Currently, psql --version prints something like
psql (PostgreSQL) 9.2beta1
contains support for command-line editing
I think the notice about readline is a leftover from the old days when
psql was often built without any readline support. Nowadays, this looks
like an anomaly, and it doesn't
