On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 02:05:47PM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Gerber
> wrote:
> > > I am encountering an error on my Postgres installation for Windows
> Server
> > > 64-bit. The error was posted her
...not MVCC.
Could we use this for geographically separated replication?
http://muratbuffalo.blogspot.com/2012/11/mdcc-multi-data-center-consistency.html
h/t Neil Conway.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfet
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>>> I see why it is implemented this way, but it's also still pretty
>>> unsatisfying because it means that with cancellation requests clients
>>> are in theory able to commit an unlimited num
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:01:17PM +0400, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:05:30PM +0400, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Noah M
* Daniel Farina:
> The idea of canceling a COMMIT statement causing a COMMIT seems pretty
> strange to me.
Canceling commits is inherently racy, so I'm not sure if this behavior
so strange after all.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
