On 12/26/2013 01:27 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
And yes, I still think that promise tuples might be a better solution
regardless of the issues you mentioned, but you know what? That doesn't
matter. Me thinking it's the
Is there any chance to implement polymorphic calls in PostgreSQL?
Consider the following definitions:
create table base_table (x integer, y integer);
create table derived_table (z integer) inherits (base_table);
create function volume(r base_table) returns integer as $$ begin return
r.x*r.y;
On 12/27/2013 07:11 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
While mulling this over further, I had an idea about this: suppose we
marked the tuple in some fashion that indicates that it's a promise
tuple. I imagine an infomask bit,
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
On reflection, I'm not sure that pg_restore as such should be applying any
server version check at all. pg_restore itself has precious little to do
with whether there will be a compatibility problem; that's mostly down to
the DDL that pg_dump put into the
Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com writes:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
So I'm inclined to propose that we set min/max to 0 and 99 here.
Something like the attached back-patched to 8.4?
Works for me.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
I wrote:
Perhaps though we should override Autoconf's setting of
_DARWIN_USE_64_BIT_INODE, if we can do that easily? It's clearly
not nearly as problem-free on 10.5 as the Autoconf boys believe,
and it's already enabled by default on the release series where it
does work.
I looked into this
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 8:44 AM, knizhnik knizh...@garret.ru wrote:
create function volume(r base_table) returns integer as $$ begin return
r.x*r.y; end; $$ language plpgsql strict stable;
create function volume(r derived_table) returns integer as $$ begin return
r.x*r.y*r.z; end; $$ language
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com writes:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
So I'm inclined to propose that we set min/max to 0 and 99
here.
Something like the attached back-patched to 8.4?
Works for me.
Done.
Thanks for the report, Joel!
--
Kevin
On Dec26, 2013, at 21:30 , Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Dec23, 2013, at 18:39 , Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On 12/19/13, 6:40 PM, Florian Pflug wrote:
The following example fails for XMLOPTION set to DOCUMENT as well as for
XMLOPTION set to CONTENT.
select xmlconcat(
One of the big appeals of the new COLLATE feature was, to me, the
possibility that we'd be able to support custom collations including
case-insensitive collations in future.
It's something I'd like to tackle one day, and in the mean time want to
pop on the TODO so it's not lost and forgotten.
On 12/30/2013 08:49 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
One of the big appeals of the new COLLATE feature was, to me, the
possibility that we'd be able to support custom collations including
case-insensitive collations in future.
It's something I'd like to tackle one day, and in the mean time want to
On 12/28/2013 06:28 PM, Mohsen SM wrote:
I create type based on varlena.
I want control it that don't toast.
In general it's probably going to be better to just specify the storage
option on a column by column basis:
ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... SET STORAGE PLAIN;
A quick look at the
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 07:51:55PM +0900, MauMau wrote:
From: Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com
Better to attack that directly. Arrange to apply any
client_encoding named in
the startup packet earlier, before authentication. This relates
to the TODO
item Let the client indicate character
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
My position is not based on a gut feeling. It is based on carefully
considering the interactions of the constituent parts, plus the
experience of actually building a working prototype.
I also carefully
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 2:06 AM, David Rowley dgrowle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
When I tried with your patch on windows, it results into following:
== running regression test queries==
test
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 2:06 AM, David Rowley dgrowle...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
When I tried with your patch on windows, it results into
16 matches
Mail list logo
