The keep-annoying-everybody-until-it-really-works caompain
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
gpg: Signature made Mit 22 Jan 2003 18:43:21 CET using DSA key ID 8C3ABF0C
gpg: BAD signature from "Rod Taylor (Database Developer) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
On Mit, 2003-01-22 at 18:43, Rod T
[no cc:s please]
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 10:31, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
> >>>"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" said:
> > On Thursday 16 January 2003 11:59, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrot
> e:
> > > On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:42, D'Ar
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 15:20, Justin Clift wrote:
>
> Now, we don't necessarily have a speed problem, as people who take the
> time to tune the database can attest to, so this is making me consider
> why such a large percentage of folk would vote for that.
>
> The possibilities that come to min
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:42, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> We are also looking at hardware solutions, multi-CPU PCs with tons (24GB) of
> memory. I know that memory will improve access if it prevents swapping but
> how well does PostgreSQL utilize multiple CPUs?
At most one CPU is used for any sin
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 08:29, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
>
> > I'm just saying that there are
> >*some* small arcane details in postgres, too (although, at least, they
> >don't affect stability, just performance)
> (i.e. arcane
> little "need to know" things that trap all but the initiated...
So, for postgres, that means:
- a good thing the autovacuum thingy is coming along
- postgres should auto-tune itself - the *cost could perhaps be
adjusted after some statistics have been collected, and there shou
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 07:03, Kevin Brown wrote:
> I have no problem with ads being put there, but they should load at
> least as fast as the rest of the site.
Huh!?
:-)
cheers
-- vbi
--
Packages should build-depend on what they should build-depend.
-- Santiago Vila on debian-devel
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 21:59, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > - Some letters, like the euro sign, do not belong to Latin1. Example: let's
> > say we have a Latin1 database and use SET CLIENT_ENCODING = 'Unicode'. If I
> > input a euro sign, does it get rejected by PostgreSQL?
>
> Currently, it gives
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 17:59, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Prasanna Phadke wrote:
> > Catch all the cricket action. Download Yahoo! Score tracker
> Step 1: Get VC++ to run under unix...
Virtual Cricket++? I don't exactly see how this applies here.
(sorry)
-- vbi
--
this email i
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 20:21, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Looks like the eWeek article has been published:
>
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,732789,00.asp
>
> Sorry for sounding like such a dork :)
A very good article, imho, for psql: The one thing people will remember
about mysql: it
Yo!
Would it be sensible not to use -announce for such things? These bits
are not really interesting if I'm subscribed to -announce to keep on top
of what's happening wrt to new releases and such things.
(Yes, I'm also subscribed to a few postgres lists, but I only read them
when I have spare tim
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 16:14, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Just in case anyone enjoys these sorts of things :) It deals with the
> whole .org TLD assignment ...
>
> http://forum.icann.org/org-eval/gartner-report
I like this one:
| Unlike many of the conventional commercial databases, Post
[Still no cc:s please]
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 14:28, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> * Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020730 08:01]:
> > On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 13:46, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > > I think one of the values of
[No cc: please. Especially if you're not commenting on anything I said]
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 13:46, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > > Curt Sampson wrote:
> > > > I'm still waiting to find out just what advantage table inheritance
> > > > offers. I've asked a couple of times here, and nobody has even
[don't cc: me, please.]
[please leave proper attribution in]
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 10:45, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > We inherited inheritance from Berkeley. I doubt we would have added it
> > > ourselves. It causes too much complexity in other parts of the system.
[Inheritance]
> >
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 18:30, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Curt Sampson wrote:
> > I'm still waiting to find out just what advantage table inheritance
> > offers. I've asked a couple of times here, and nobody has even started
> > to come up with anything.
>
> We inherited inheritance from Berkeley. I d
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 19:43, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > OTOH, it is also important where the file is on disk. As seen from disk
> > speed test graphs on http://www.tomshardware.com , the speed difference
> > of sequential reads is 1.5 to 2.5 between inner and o
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 15:52, mlw wrote:
> Dale Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Hello Group,
> >I need your help, in putting together a list of comparisons, and good solid
>technical reasons, to why to use PostgreSQL over using Microsoft SQL Server. Right
>now, we are using PostgreSQL for a back-en
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 15:52, mlw wrote:
> Dale Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Hello Group,
> >I need your help, in putting together a list of comparisons, and
good solid technical reasons, to why to use PostgreSQL over using
Microsoft SQL Server. Right now, we are using PostgreSQL for a back-end
fo
19 matches
Mail list logo
