Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Transactions within a function body

Have you looked at creating a function in perl and creating a new connection? Or using a dblink query which can create a new connection? These two methods work. I have used them to insert to a log table regardless of the parent transaction being commited or rolled back. A old example I posted of

Re: [HACKERS] Nested xacts: looking for testers and review

This may be out of scope but I'm goign to mention it. Would error trapping help any of these issues. In Oracle PL/SQL you have an exception section to handle any known or unknown errors. Is this for the future or does the nested xacts code include this at all?

Re: [HACKERS] Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004

Sounds like a project manager type should be put into place to organize this information into a straight stream instead of 50 random mists of water |-+-- | | Andrew Dunstan | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |

Re: [HACKERS] Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004

I really hate seeing all the developers wasting time and brain cycles on this type of stuff. I would much rather that time and brain cycles be put to the design and development of the code. Would a project manager type position be of any value to take some of this off the developers and

Re: [HACKERS] Nested xacts: looking for testers and review

I think before this can be tested fully by a wide audience there needs to be some basic documentation. Or is there? What is the new syntax? Can we see some basic examples that you have used in your testing? Regards Bob |-+-- | |

Re: [HACKERS] Nested xacts: looking for testers and review

This reply was meant to be directed to Alvaro. |-+-- | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | .com | | | Sent by: | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | |

Re: [HACKERS] ~ crashes backend

I have binary install from snapshot from the other night on WINDOWS 2000 PRO and had same problem. |-+-- | | Merlin Moncure | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | ne.com| | |

Re: [HACKERS] ~ crashes backend

I downloaded it this morning around 8:00 AM CENTRAL TIME. Thanks for the builds by the way! |-+-- | | Merlin Moncure | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | online.com| | |

Re: [HACKERS] 7.5 features

I think great would be an understatement. Great work all! |-+-- | | Bruce Momjian | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | | | | Sent by: | |

Re: [HACKERS] PITR, nested transactions, tablespaces, 2-phase commit:

Just so you know I'm very thankful for your hard work and I'm sure many of us are. I have been waiting for this kind of functionally in Postgresql! |-+-- | | Heikki Linnakangas | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |

Re: [HACKERS] Socket communication for contrib

as it stands. Bob Henkel 651-738-5085 Mutual Funds I/T Woodbury Hartford Life 500 Bielenberg Drive Woodbury, MN 55125 |-+-- | | Tom Lane | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | Sent

Re: [HACKERS] Socket communication for contrib

I would be FOR it if the README states the dangers Bob Henkel 651-738-5085 Mutual Funds I/T Woodbury Hartford Life 500 Bielenberg Drive Woodbury, MN 55125 |-+ | | Hans-Jürgen | | | Schönig