Re: [HACKERS] plperl failure on OS X 10.5(.1)

2007-11-21 Thread Brandon Maust
On 21 Nov, 2007, at 11:38 , Tom Lane wrote: Brandon Maust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: yes, it is sucking it in (via handy.h), at least in 10.5: #if 1 /* always on Mac OS X */ # include # ifndef HAS_BOOL #define HAS_BOOL 1 # endif #endif Nasty. I'm still surprised that

Re: [HACKERS] plperl failure on OS X 10.5(.1)

2007-11-21 Thread Brandon Maust
On 21 Nov, 2007, at 10:50 , Tom Lane wrote: Brandon Maust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On 21 Nov, 2007, at 08:39 , Tom Lane wrote: Seems the question is not so much about OS X as it is about what perl you're using ... it's 5.8.8, as provided by apple (same for gcc, etc)

Re: [HACKERS] plperl failure on OS X 10.5(.1)

2007-11-21 Thread Brandon Maust
On 21 Nov, 2007, at 08:39 , Tom Lane wrote: Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Nothing fatal? Huh, you have a curious idea about warnings. This makes me think you have the wrong headers or something -- the argument mentioned in all these cases is bool, so maybe there is an ABI inco