On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com wrote:
Actually the issue is what to do about a number of connectors which use a
fairly standard '?' as a placeholder.
Notably absent from the discussion is ODBC upon which JDBC was modelled
and probably predates any use of ?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
What if something like this was made to work?
select '{3:5}'::jsonb operator(pg_catalog.?) '3';
(Where the double quotes around the ? would be tolerated, which they
currently are not)
Is there a reason it can't be
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should be more focused on this part of the issue. It seems
to me that it's a good idea for connectors to have an escaping
mechanism. Pretty much any syntax that supports funny characters that
do magical
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane g...@turnstep.com
wrote:
If you are running into situations
where you have question mark operators in your queries, you have already
lost
the query abstraction battle. There will be no seamless switching if you
are using jsonb, hstore,
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
David G. Johnston david.g.johns...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Bruno Harbulot
br...@distributedmatter.netwrote:
In the discussion on the OpenJDK JDBC list two years ago
(
http
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:50 PM, David G. Johnston
david.g.johns...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
Gavin Flower gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz wrote:
I prefer the $1 approach, others can't use that, and there are
situations where
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Mike Blackwell mike.blackw...@rrd.com
wrote:
A Google search suggests Oracle 9.x supports a unary '?' operator (fuzzy
match), so the use of '?' in an operator name is not without precedent.
Interesting. Do you have any specific link? I'm probably not using the
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane g...@turnstep.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Dave Cramer opined:
It would seem that choosing ? for operators was ill advised; I'm not
convinced that deprecating them is a bad idea. If we start now, in 5
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane g...@turnstep.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Bruno Harbulot asked for a devil's advocate by saying:
My main point was that this is not specific to JDBC. Considering that
even
PostgreSQL's own ECPG
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com wrote:
I don't really want to take a violently strong position on this
without understanding what's really going on here.
Well our solution was to use
Hello,
I've been trying to use the new JSONB format using JDBC, and ran into
trouble with the question mark operators (?, ?| and ?).
I realise there has already been a discussion about this (actually, it was
about hstore, not jsonb, but that's more or less the same problem):
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
