On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Dev Kumkar devdas.kum...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies for the delay, was working/troubleshooting same issue and was
away from my emails. :(
Regards...
Received the database with huge pg_multixact directory of size 21G and
there are ~82,000 files in pg_multixact
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Yes: Learning some patience. You'd given the previous answer two hours
before this one. Nobody is paid to work on this list...
Apologies for the delay, was working/troubleshooting same issue and was
away from my
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Dev Kumkar devdas.kum...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I don't think that's relevant for you.
Did you upgrade the database using pg_upgrade?
That's correct! No, there is no upgrade here
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Dev Kumkar devdas.kum...@gmail.comwrote:
+ hackers
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Dev Kumkar devdas.kum...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Dev Kumkar devdas.kum...@gmail.comwrote:
Actually for searches lower will work.
But the other
+ hackers
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Dev Kumkar devdas.kum...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Dev Kumkar devdas.kum...@gmail.comwrote:
Actually for searches lower will work.
But the other important aspect is 'inserts' which would result 2 rows if
the values
http://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers/since/200905171950Hello,
Am looking for the patch related to 'Implementation of GROUPING SETS'.
Where can get this from?
Related thread:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/162867790905121420p7c910054x24d8e327abd58...@mail.gmail.com
Regards...
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello
I don't work on this topic now, and my code is not usable for production.
Ok, no problem. Will await for any other pointers regarding any related
patch here.
Currently using UNION to archive similar results
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Atri Sharma atri.j...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Dev Kumkar devdas.kum...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok, no problem. Will await for any other pointers regarding any related
patch here.
Currently using UNION to archive similar results
Hello,
Is there an alternative of Sybase on existing update construct in pgsql.
ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE doesn't work.
Thanks in advance!
Regards - Dev
Well ya, stored procedure also was thinking about pre-insert trigger.
Am sure folks here must have gone thru this and had alternatives. Also was
reading about merge_by_key.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Daniel Farina dan...@heroku.com wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Dev Kumkar
Please do not top-post on the PostgreSQL lists. See
http://idallen.com/topposting.html
Also, note that pgsql-hackers is entirely the wrong list for this sort of
question. You should have been asking on pgsql-general.
Apologies for top-post!
Well I thought pgsql-hackers will suggest some new
Basically I was referring to this link http://mbk.projects.postgresql.org
Any suggestions here?
Thanks!
Hello Everyone,
I am using postgres 9.2 and when executing function dblink facing a fatal
error while trying to execute dblink_connect as follows:
* SELECT * FROM dblink_connect('host=127.0.0.1 port=5432 dbname=postgres
password=test')*
*ERROR*: could not establish connection DETAIL:
13 matches
Mail list logo
