I think this trend is MUCH bigger than what Postgres, Inc. is doing... its
happening all over
the comminity. Heck take a look around... Jabber, Postgres, Red Hat, SuSe,
Storm etc. etc.
these companies are making good money off a business plan that was basically
"hey, lets take some
of that open
No, not at all. At least for me, if I write code which is dependent on
the open source work of others, then hell yes, that work should also be
open source. That, to me, is the difference between right and wrong.
Actually, your not legally bound to anything if you write "new" additional
code,
*someone* to make money.
- Original Message -
From: "The Hermit Hacker" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Gary MacDougall" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "mlw" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Hannu Krosing" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Thomas
Lockhart" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "
Correct me if I'm wrong but in the last 3 years what company that you
know of didn't consider an IPO part of the "business and such". Most
tech companies that have been formed in the last 4 - 5 years have one
thing on the brain--IPO. It's the #1 thing (sadly) that they care about.
I only wished
saying.
g.
- Original Message -
From: "The Hermit Hacker" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Gary MacDougall" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "mlw" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Hannu Krosing" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Thomas
Lockhart" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Don Bac
tthew" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'Alfred Perlstein '" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "'Gary MacDougall '"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] cygwin gcc problem.
I sucessfully compiled 7.0.2 on Win 2000 recently. I had a
I'm trying to compile postgresql on Windows
2000. I've followed the directions accordingly.
When I run the "configure" script, and I get the
following error message:
configure: error installation or configuration
problem: C compiler cannot create executables.
If anyone has any clues,
