Tom Lane wrote:
Janardhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Does it breaks any other things if all the index entries pointing the
dead tuple are removed before reusing the dead tuple?.
Possibly you could make that work, but I think you'll find the
efficiency ad
The file "ftp://candle.pha.pa.us/pub/postgresql/PITR_20020822_02.gz"
do not
have read permissions to copy. please provide the read permissions to
copy.
Regards
jana
Patrick Macdonald wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I wanted to outline some of the big items we are loo
Tom Lane wrote:
Janardhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Does it breaks anythings by overwriting the dead tuples ?.
Yes. You cannot do that unless you've first removed index entries
pointing at the dead tuples --- and jumped through the same locking
hoop
Tom Lane wrote:
Janardhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Does it breaks anythings by overwriting the dead tuples ?.
Yes. You cannot do that unless you've first removed index entries
pointing at the dead tuples --- and jumped through the same locking
hoop
Hi,
I am doing some experiments on dead tuples, I am looking of reusing the
dead tuples apace in a particular page during the "Update".This patch
is meant for the tables
which are heavily updated to avoid vacuum very frequently.By using it
will arrest the size of
table for heavily updated ta
