[HACKERS] [ppa][PATCHES] Argument handling improvements

Below are links for the patch and binary (image) files for argument handling improvements in ppa. You can view the original concept @ http://jawed.name/pgsql_soc. It provides support for both JS and JS deficient users. I tried to keep it within the coding guidelines set forth. I appreciate and l

Re: [HACKERS] Snowball and ispell in tsearch2

OpenFTS ebuild: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135859 It has a USE flag for the snowball stemmer. I can take care of packaging for Gentoo if it will free up time for you to work on other distros. John PS, upstream package size isn't, and shouldn't be an issue, it should be left to the p

Re: [HACKERS] Connection Broken with Custom Dicts for TSearch2

Since we are on the topic, is there a timeline/plans for openfts being brought into core? If not, I'll continue my work on bringing it into Gentoo Portage. John On 6/5/06, Oleg Bartunov wrote: On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Teodor Sigaev wrote: > > > Teodor Sigaev wrote: >> Sorry, it isn't mentioned on

Re: [HACKERS] Improving ALTER TYPE support

Ok, this way works and the proposed way isn't necessary. On 5/24/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "John Jawed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess I don't understand what one has to do with the other (SRF's > returning records and OUT parame

Re: [HACKERS] Improving ALTER TYPE support

I guess I don't understand what one has to do with the other (SRF's returning records and OUT parameters). I always thought they were exclusive, could you elaborate?On 5/24/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Josh Berkus writes:>> I've been working on a function which retu

Re: [HACKERS] Improving ALTER TYPE support

Makes more sense to do that, and I think it'll be cleaner to implement as well.On 5/23/06, Josh Berkus wrote:John,> I've been working on a function which returns a setof a composite type. > Everytime I've changed the structure of the returning setof, I've had to> change the typ

[HACKERS] Improving ALTER TYPE support

I've been working on a function which returns a setof a composite type. Everytime I've changed the structure of the returning setof, I've had to change the type accordingly, which current means doing a drop type ... cascade down to the function. We should allow one of the following: 1) Add a REPLAC