On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
> On 8 January 2017 at 17:26, Greg Stark wrote:
> > On 5 January 2017 at 19:01, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> That's a bit odd - shouldn't the OS network stack take care of this in
> >> both cases? I mean either is too big for TCP packets (includi
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Jonathon Nelson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Andres Freund
> wrote:
> >> On 2017-01-05 12:55:44 -0600, Jonathon Nelson wrote:
>
> >>> In our lab environm
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017-01-05 12:55:44 -0600, Jonathon Nelson wrote:
> > Attached please find a patch for PostgreSQL 9.4 which changes the maximum
> > amount of data that the wal sender will send at any point in time from
>
Attached please find a patch for PostgreSQL 9.4 which changes the maximum
amount of data that the wal sender will send at any point in time from the
hard-coded value of 128KiB to a user-controllable value up to 16MiB. It has
been primarily tested under 9.4 but there has been some testing with 9.5.
