Re: [INTERFACES] [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

Bruce Momjian wrote: > ... > OK, Marc has removed libpgtcl. I just removed the docs for them. > > Can someone comment on pgtclsh? The README says: >... > > Do we need to move that over to gborg? If so, you can pull it out of > 7.4 CVS. > > Anyone? Already discussed: http://archives.postgre

Re: [INTERFACES] [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces? Isn't it now on gborg? Are > > there two of them there now? > > I am still waiting for an answer on this. Does no one know? I replied right away - to you and the lists you posted to. Never got it? It's

Re: [HACKERS] [INTERFACES] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces? Isn't it now on gborg? Are > there two of them there now? There are indeed two - mine and the other one: http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pgtclng/ Version 1.5.0 released 2004-02-29 (source, manual, and Windows binary